183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33406946)
1. Impaired validity of the new FIGO and Swedish CTG classification templates to identify fetal acidosis in the first stage of labor.
Ekengård F; Cardell M; Herbst A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):4853-4860. PubMed ID: 33406946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low sensitivity of the new FIGO classification system for electronic fetal monitoring to identify fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor.
Ekengård F; Cardell M; Herbst A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2021 Jan; 9():100120. PubMed ID: 33319210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interobserver agreement in analysis of cardiotocograms recorded during trial of labor after cesarean.
Caning MM; Thisted DLA; Amer-Wählin I; Laier GH; Krebs L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3778-3783. PubMed ID: 29724142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Accuracy of the FIGO and the 5-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Classification Systems in the Detection of Neonatal Acidemia.
Martí Gamboa S; Giménez OR; Mancho JP; Moros ML; Sada JR; Mateo SC
Am J Perinatol; 2017 Apr; 34(5):508-514. PubMed ID: 27780275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE cardiotocography interpretation guidelines.
Santo S; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Santos C; Schnettler W; Ugwumadu A; Da Graça LM;
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 27869985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of Posterior Risk Related to Intrapartum FIGO 2015 Criteria for Cardiotocography in the Second Stage of Labor.
Cavoretto PI; Seidenari A; Amodeo S; Della Gatta AN; Nale R; Ismail YS; Candiani M; Farina A
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2021; 48(2):149-157. PubMed ID: 33508830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CTG interpretation templates affect residents' decision making.
Ekengård F; Cardell M; Herbst A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jun; 285():148-152. PubMed ID: 37120910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hazard and cumulative incidence of umbilical cord metabolic acidemia at birth in fetuses experiencing the second stage of labor and pathologic intrapartum fetal heart rate requiring expedited delivery.
Cavoretto PI; Seidenari A; Farina A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 307(4):1225-1232. PubMed ID: 35596749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between umbilical vein-to-artery delta pH and type of intrapartum hypoxia in a cohort of acidemic neonates: A retrospective analysis of CTG findings.
Ghi T; Chandraharan E; Fieni S; Dall'Asta A; Galli L; Ferretti A; Ricciardi P; Locatelli A; Lambicchi L; Bellussi F; Pilu G; Frusca T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Dec; 231():25-29. PubMed ID: 30317141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity and specificity of intrapartum computerised FIGO criteria for cardiotocography and fetal scalp pH during labour: multicentre, observational study.
Schiermeier S; Pildner von Steinburg S; Thieme A; Reinhard J; Daumer M; Scholz M; Hatzmann W; Schneider KT
BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1557-63. PubMed ID: 18752587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiotocographic findings in the second stage of labor among fetuses delivered with acidemia: a comparison of two classification systems.
Ghi T; Morganelli G; Bellussi F; Rucci P; Giorgetta F; Rizzo N; Frusca T; Pilu G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():297-302. PubMed ID: 27423030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic capacity and interobserver variability in FIGO, ACOG, NICE and Chandraharan cardiotocographic guidelines to predict neonatal acidemia.
Zamora Del Pozo C; Chóliz Ezquerro M; Mejía I; Díaz de Terán Martínez-Berganza E; Esteban LM; Rivero Alonso A; Castán Larraz B; Andeyro García M; Savirón Cornudella R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):8498-8506. PubMed ID: 34652249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A letter to the editor regarding the article "Impaired validity of the new FIGO and Swedish CTG classification templates to identify fetal acidosis in the first stage of labor".
Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7071-7072. PubMed ID: 34167413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reply to; a letter to the editor regarding the article "Impaired validity of the new FIGO and Swedish CTG classification templates to identify fetal acidosis in the first stage of labor".
Ekengård F; Cardell M; Herbst A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7082-7083. PubMed ID: 34167414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Types of intrapartum hypoxia in the newborn at term with metabolic acidemia: A retrospective study.
Descourvieres L; Ghesquiere L; Drumez E; Martin C; Sauvage A; Subtil D; Houfflin-Debarge V; Garabedian C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Nov; 101(11):1276-1281. PubMed ID: 36004701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Four Intrapartum Cardiotocography Classifications for Predicting Neonatal Acidemia at Birth.
Troha N; Razem K; Luzovec U; Lucovnik M
J Pregnancy; 2023; 2023():5853889. PubMed ID: 36814692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deceleration area and fetal acidemia.
Martí Gamboa S; Lapresta Moros M; Pascual Mancho J; Lapresta Moros C; Castán Mateo S
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Nov; 30(21):2578-2584. PubMed ID: 27819172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of a revised classification for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring and association to birth outcome: A national cohort study.
Jonsson M; Söderling J; Ladfors L; Nordström L; Nilsson M; Algovik M; Norman M; Holzmann M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Feb; 101(2):183-192. PubMed ID: 35092004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Indirect standard cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus indirect quantitative cardiotocography--a randomized comparative study in intrapartum monitoring].
Ignatov P; Atanasov B
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(5):3-10. PubMed ID: 23234029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
