171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33407829)
1. Improved analysis of CRISPR fitness screens and reduced off-target effects with the BAGEL2 gene essentiality classifier.
Kim E; Hart T
Genome Med; 2021 Jan; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 33407829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CRISPR-Cas9 screens reveal common essential miRNAs in human cancer cell lines.
Merk DJ; Paul L; Tsiami F; Hohenthanner H; Kouchesfahani GM; Haeusser LA; Walter B; Brown A; Persky NS; Root DE; Tabatabai G
Genome Med; 2024 Jun; 16(1):82. PubMed ID: 38886809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation and Design of Genome-Wide CRISPR/SpCas9 Knockout Screens.
Hart T; Tong AHY; Chan K; Van Leeuwen J; Seetharaman A; Aregger M; Chandrashekhar M; Hustedt N; Seth S; Noonan A; Habsid A; Sizova O; Nedyalkova L; Climie R; Tworzyanski L; Lawson K; Sartori MA; Alibeh S; Tieu D; Masud S; Mero P; Weiss A; Brown KR; Usaj M; Billmann M; Rahman M; Constanzo M; Myers CL; Andrews BJ; Boone C; Durocher D; Moffat J
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Aug; 7(8):2719-2727. PubMed ID: 28655737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BAGEL: a computational framework for identifying essential genes from pooled library screens.
Hart T; Moffat J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 17():164. PubMed ID: 27083490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recovering false negatives in CRISPR fitness screens with JLOE.
Dede M; Hart T
Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Feb; 51(4):1637-1651. PubMed ID: 36727483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unsupervised correction of gene-independent cell responses to CRISPR-Cas9 targeting.
Iorio F; Behan FM; Gonçalves E; Bhosle SG; Chen E; Shepherd R; Beaver C; Ansari R; Pooley R; Wilkinson P; Harper S; Butler AP; Stronach EA; Saez-Rodriguez J; Yusa K; Garnett MJ
BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(1):604. PubMed ID: 30103702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An interactive web application for processing, correcting, and visualizing genome-wide pooled CRISPR-Cas9 screens.
Vinceti A; De Lucia RR; Cremaschi P; Perron U; Karakoc E; Mauri L; Fernandez C; Kluczynski KH; Anderson DS; Iorio F
Cell Rep Methods; 2023 Jan; 3(1):100373. PubMed ID: 36814834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells.
Meyers RM; Bryan JG; McFarland JM; Weir BA; Sizemore AE; Xu H; Dharia NV; Montgomery PG; Cowley GS; Pantel S; Goodale A; Lee Y; Ali LD; Jiang G; Lubonja R; Harrington WF; Strickland M; Wu T; Hawes DC; Zhivich VA; Wyatt MR; Kalani Z; Chang JJ; Okamoto M; Stegmaier K; Golub TR; Boehm JS; Vazquez F; Root DE; Hahn WC; Tsherniak A
Nat Genet; 2017 Dec; 49(12):1779-1784. PubMed ID: 29083409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring error rates in genomic perturbation screens: gold standards for human functional genomics.
Hart T; Brown KR; Sircoulomb F; Rottapel R; Moffat J
Mol Syst Biol; 2014 Jul; 10(7):733. PubMed ID: 24987113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrative analysis of pooled CRISPR genetic screens using MAGeCKFlute.
Wang B; Wang M; Zhang W; Xiao T; Chen CH; Wu A; Wu F; Traugh N; Wang X; Li Z; Mei S; Cui Y; Shi S; Lipp JJ; Hinterndorfer M; Zuber J; Brown M; Li W; Liu XS
Nat Protoc; 2019 Mar; 14(3):756-780. PubMed ID: 30710114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ACE: a probabilistic model for characterizing gene-level essentiality in CRISPR screens.
Hutton ER; Vakoc CR; Siepel A
Genome Biol; 2021 Sep; 22(1):278. PubMed ID: 34556174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PICKLES v3: the updated database of pooled in vitro CRISPR knockout library essentiality screens.
Novak LC; Chou J; Colic M; Bristow CA; Hart T
Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Jan; 51(D1):D1117-D1121. PubMed ID: 36350677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inferring cancer dependencies on metabolic genes from large-scale genetic screens.
Lagziel S; Lee WD; Shlomi T
BMC Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(1):37. PubMed ID: 31039782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities.
Hart T; Chandrashekhar M; Aregger M; Steinhart Z; Brown KR; MacLeod G; Mis M; Zimmermann M; Fradet-Turcotte A; Sun S; Mero P; Dirks P; Sidhu S; Roth FP; Rissland OS; Durocher D; Angers S; Moffat J
Cell; 2015 Dec; 163(6):1515-26. PubMed ID: 26627737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PICKLES: the database of pooled in-vitro CRISPR knockout library essentiality screens.
Lenoir WF; Lim TL; Hart T
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jan; 46(D1):D776-D780. PubMed ID: 29077937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genome-scale CRISPR screening at high sensitivity with an empirically designed sgRNA library.
Henkel L; Rauscher B; Schmitt B; Winter J; Boutros M
BMC Biol; 2020 Nov; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 33228647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ScreenBEAM: a novel meta-analysis algorithm for functional genomics screens via Bayesian hierarchical modeling.
Yu J; Silva J; Califano A
Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 32(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 26415723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Method to Map Gene Essentiality of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells by Genome-Scale CRISPR Screens with Inducible Cas9.
Mair B; Aregger M; Tong AHY; Chan KSK; Moffat J
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2377():1-27. PubMed ID: 34709608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. JACKS: joint analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens.
Allen F; Behan F; Khodak A; Iorio F; Yusa K; Garnett M; Parts L
Genome Res; 2019 Mar; 29(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 30674557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A High-Resolution Genome-Wide CRISPR/Cas9 Viability Screen Reveals Structural Features and Contextual Diversity of the Human Cell-Essential Proteome.
Bertomeu T; Coulombe-Huntington J; Chatr-Aryamontri A; Bourdages KG; Coyaud E; Raught B; Xia Y; Tyers M
Mol Cell Biol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):. PubMed ID: 29038160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
