These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1656 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33409778)

  • 1. Prospective comparison of integrated on-site CT-fractional flow reserve and static CT perfusion with coronary CT angiography for detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis.
    Guo W; Lin Y; Taniguchi A; Zhu Y; Tripathi P; Yang S; Liu J; Yun H; Jin H; Zhang J; Yang J; Zeng M
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5096-5105. PubMed ID: 33409778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion With a Whole-Heart Coverage Scanner in Addition to Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve Computed Tomography Derived.
    Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Soldi M; Del Torto A; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Olivares P; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Dec; 12(12):2460-2471. PubMed ID: 31005531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study.
    Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Fazzari F; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 12(8 Pt 1):1487-1497. PubMed ID: 30343073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs
    Williams MC; Mirsadraee S; Dweck MR; Weir NW; Fletcher A; Lucatelli C; MacGillivray T; Golay SK; Cruden NL; Henriksen PA; Uren N; McKillop G; Lima JA; Reid JH; van Beek EJ; Patel D; Newby DE
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 27334015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
    Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion.
    Yang DH; Kim YH; Roh JH; Kang JW; Ahn JM; Kweon J; Lee JB; Choi SH; Shin ES; Park DW; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ; Lim TH
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 18(4):432-440. PubMed ID: 27354345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve using reduced-order modelling and static computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
    Ihdayhid AR; Sakaguchi T; Linde JJ; Sørgaard MH; Kofoed KF; Fujisawa Y; Hislop-Jambrich J; Nerlekar N; Cameron JD; Munnur RK; Crosset M; Wong DTL; Seneviratne SK; Ko BS
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1234-1243. PubMed ID: 30137268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On-site assessment of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging and invasive fractional flow reserve.
    Miyajima K; Motoyama S; Sarai M; Kawai H; Nagahara Y; Matsumoto R; Fujiwara W; Muramatsu T; Takahashi H; Naruse H; Ishii J; Kondo T; Narula J; Izawa H; Ozaki Y
    Heart Vessels; 2020 Oct; 35(10):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 32350637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study.
    Rochitte CE; George RT; Chen MY; Arbab-Zadeh A; Dewey M; Miller JM; Niinuma H; Yoshioka K; Kitagawa K; Nakamori S; Laham R; Vavere AL; Cerci RJ; Mehra VC; Nomura C; Kofoed KF; Jinzaki M; Kuribayashi S; de Roos A; Laule M; Tan SY; Hoe J; Paul N; Rybicki FJ; Brinker JA; Arai AE; Cox C; Clouse ME; Di Carli MF; Lima JA
    Eur Heart J; 2014 May; 35(17):1120-30. PubMed ID: 24255127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of machine learning-based CT fractional flow reserve with cardiac MR perfusion mapping for ischemia diagnosis in stable coronary artery disease.
    Guo W; Zhao S; Xu H; He W; Yin L; Yao Z; Xu Z; Jin H; Wu D; Li C; Yang S; Zeng M
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Sep; 34(9):5654-5665. PubMed ID: 38409549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Computed Tomography-Fractional Flow Reserve in Functional Myocardial Ischemia Assessment Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Gonzalez JA; Lipinski MJ; Flors L; Shaw PW; Kramer CM; Salerno M
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Nov; 116(9):1469-78. PubMed ID: 26347004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rationale and design of advantage (additional diagnostic value of CT perfusion over coronary CT angiography in stented patients with suspected in-stent restenosis or coronary artery disease progression) prospective study.
    Andreini D; Mushtaq S; Pontone G; Conte E; Sonck J; Collet C; Guglielmo M; Baggiano A; Trabattoni D; Galli S; Montorsi P; Ferrari C; Fabbiocchi F; De Martini S; Annoni A; Mancini ME; Formenti A; Magatelli M; Resta M; Consiglio E; Muscogiuri G; Fiorentini C; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(5):411-417. PubMed ID: 29933938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical value of resting cardiac dual-energy CT in patients suspected of coronary artery disease.
    Li W; Yu F; Liu M; Yan C
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Feb; 22(1):32. PubMed ID: 35220940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of machine-learning CT-derived fractional flow reserve for the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease in the randomized CRESCENT trials.
    Nous FMA; Budde RPJ; Lubbers MM; Yamasaki Y; Kardys I; Bruning TA; Akkerhuis JM; Kofflard MJM; Kietselaer B; Galema TW; Nieman K
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3692-3701. PubMed ID: 32166492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A stepwise strategy integrating dynamic stress CT myocardial perfusion and deep learning-based FFR
    Lyu L; Pan J; Li D; Yu D; Li X; Yang W; Dong M; Han Y; Liang Y; Zhang P; Zhang M
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; 34(8):4939-4949. PubMed ID: 38214735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low-dose CT perfusion with combined use of CTP and CTP-derived coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp: validation with invasive fractional flow reserve.
    Yi Y; Xu C; Wu W; Shen ZJ; Lee W; Yun CH; Lu B; Zhang JY; Jin ZY; Wang YN
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):1119-1129. PubMed ID: 32809164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incremental Diagnostic Value of Stress Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion With Whole-Heart Coverage CT Scanner in Intermediate- to High-Risk Symptomatic Patients Suspected of Coronary Artery Disease.
    Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Baggiano A; Fazzari F; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Berzovini CM; Pasquini A; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb; 12(2):338-349. PubMed ID: 29454774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computed Tomographic Perfusion Improves Diagnostic Power of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Women: Analysis of the CORE320 Trial (Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 320-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion) According to Gender.
    Penagaluri A; Higgins AY; Vavere AL; Miller JM; Arbab-Zadeh A; Betoko A; Steveson C; Zimmermann E; Cox C; Rochitte CE; Dewey M; Kofoed KF; Niinuma H; Di Carli MF; Lima JA; Chen MY
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 27811151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FFR CT and Static Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Therapeutic Decision-making and Prognosis in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
    Li SY; Zhong J; Qiao HY; Schoepf UJ; Emrich T; Butler WN; Zuo R; Xue Y; Liu Y; Dai LY; Zhou CS; Lu GM; Tang CX; Zhang LJ
    J Thorac Imaging; 2024 Mar; 39(2):101-110. PubMed ID: 37265250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The diagnostic performance of SPECT-MPI to predict functional significant coronary artery disease by fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFR
    Nakanishi R; Osawa K; Ceponiene I; Huth G; Cole J; Kim M; Nezarat N; Rahmani S; Li D; Gupta S; Rogers C; Dailing C; Budoff MJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec; 33(12):2067-2072. PubMed ID: 28699019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 83.