These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33409985)

  • 21. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony.
    Marsh HW; Guo J; Dicke T; Parker PD; Craven RG
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):102-119. PubMed ID: 31204844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimating person parameters via item response model and simple sum score in small samples with few polytomous items: A simulation study.
    Schwall P; Meesters C; Hardt J
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(21):4040-4050. PubMed ID: 31236972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Second-Order Disjoint Factor Analysis.
    Cavicchia C; Vichi M
    Psychometrika; 2022 Mar; 87(1):289-309. PubMed ID: 34403112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measuring health literacy in community agencies: a Bayesian study of the factor structure and measurement invariance of the health literacy questionnaire (HLQ).
    Elsworth GR; Beauchamp A; Osborne RH
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Sep; 16(1):508. PubMed ID: 27659559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reassessment of innovative methods to determine the number of factors: A simulation-based comparison of exploratory graph analysis and next eigenvalue sufficiency test.
    Brandenburg N; Papenberg M
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Feb; 29(1):21-47. PubMed ID: 35925729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models.
    Epskamp S; Rhemtulla M; Borsboom D
    Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):904-927. PubMed ID: 28290111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of confirmatory factor analysis and multidimensional Rasch models to investigate the dimensionality of test-taking motivation.
    Demars CE
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):179-96. PubMed ID: 23816595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extending Tests of Random Effects to Assess for Measurement Invariance in Factor Models.
    Zhang Z; Braun TM; Peterson KE; Hu H; Téllez-Rojo MM; Sánchez BN
    Stat Biosci; 2018 Dec; 10(3):634-650. PubMed ID: 30805035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing cross-national invariance of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE).
    Pignon B; Peyre H; Ferchiou A; van Os J; Rutten BPF; Murray RM; Morgan C; Leboyer M; Schürhoff F; Szöke A;
    Psychol Med; 2019 Nov; 49(15):2600-2607. PubMed ID: 30514407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups.
    Marsh HW; Guo J; Parker PD; Nagengast B; Asparouhov T; Muthén B; Dicke T
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):524-545. PubMed ID: 28080078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Quest for Comparability: Studying the Invariance of the Teachers' Sense of Self-Efficacy (TSES) Measure across Countries.
    Scherer R; Jansen M; Nilsen T; Areepattamannil S; Marsh HW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150829. PubMed ID: 26959236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Model Fit and Item Factor Analysis: Overfactoring, Underfactoring, and a Program to Guide Interpretation.
    Clark DA; Bowles RP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(4):544-558. PubMed ID: 29683723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Impact of Partial Factorial Invariance on Cross-Group Comparisons.
    Shi D; Song H; Lewis MD
    Assessment; 2019 Oct; 26(7):1217-1233. PubMed ID: 28598216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The CBCL/1½-5's DSM-ASD Scale: Confirmatory Factor Analyses Across 24 Societies.
    Rescorla LA; Adams A; Ivanova MY;
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2020 Sep; 50(9):3326-3340. PubMed ID: 31559509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A critical assessment of sparse PCA (research): why (one should acknowledge that) weights are not loadings.
    Park S; Ceulemans E; Van Deun K
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1413-1432. PubMed ID: 37540466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Swedish version of the Insomnia Severity Index: Factor structure analysis and psychometric properties in chronic pain patients.
    Dragioti E; Wiklund T; Alföldi P; Gerdle B
    Scand J Pain; 2015 Oct; 9(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 29911642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Beck hopelessness scale (BHS): results from a German representative population sample.
    Kliem S; Lohmann A; Mößle T; Brähler E
    BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Apr; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 29699522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantifying and addressing the impact of measurement error in network models.
    de Ron J; Robinaugh DJ; Fried EI; Pedrelli P; Jain FA; Mischoulon D; Epskamp S
    Behav Res Ther; 2022 Oct; 157():104163. PubMed ID: 36030733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Problems of Domain Factors with Small Factor Loadings in Bi-Factor Models.
    Petras N; Meiser T
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(1):123-147. PubMed ID: 37665717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ranking competitors using degree-neutralized random walks.
    Shin S; Ahnert SE; Park J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e113685. PubMed ID: 25517977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.