These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33410015)

  • 1. Evaluating the sustainability of big data centers using the analytic network process and fuzzy TOPSIS.
    Zhang Q; Yang S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17913-17927. PubMed ID: 33410015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
    Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of product conceptual design based on Pythagorean fuzzy set under big data environment.
    Ma LD; Wang WX; Xie JW; Zhang N; Hu NF; Wang ZA
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22387. PubMed ID: 36575300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
    Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Construction 4.0 technology evaluation using fuzzy TOPSIS: comparison between sustainability and resiliency, well-being, productivity, safety, and integrity.
    Shafei H; Rahman RA; Lee YS
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(10):14858-14893. PubMed ID: 38285259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A process mining approach in big data analysis and modeling decision making risks for measuring environmental health in institutions.
    Dehghani M; Shooshtarian MR; Moosavi P; Zare F; Derakhshan Z; Ferrante M; Conti GO; Jafari S
    Environ Res; 2022 Jan; 203():111804. PubMed ID: 34339703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sustainable collection center location selection in emerging economy for electronic waste with fuzzy Best-Worst and fuzzy TOPSIS.
    Sagnak M; Berberoglu Y; Memis İ; Yazgan O
    Waste Manag; 2021 May; 127():37-47. PubMed ID: 33930684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating environmental sustainability: an integration of multiple-criteria decision-making and fuzzy logic.
    Liu KF
    Environ Manage; 2007 May; 39(5):721-36. PubMed ID: 17377731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sustainable supply chain partner selection and order allocation: A hybrid fuzzy PL-TODIM based MCGDM approach.
    Zhong S; Zhang J; He X; Liu S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0271194. PubMed ID: 36137146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolved distance measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their exploitation in the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions.
    Chen TY
    Artif Intell Rev; 2023; 56(7):7347-7401. PubMed ID: 36536928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating lecturer performance in Vietnam: An application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods.
    Do QH; Tran VT; Tran TT
    Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(11):e30772. PubMed ID: 38933935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study.
    Büyüközkan G; Tüfekçi G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53507-53519. PubMed ID: 34031840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery.
    Hancerliogullari G; Hancerliogullari KO; Koksalmis E
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28114944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of fuzzy multi-criteria approach to prioritize locations of treated wastewater use considering climate change scenarios.
    Chung ES; Kim Y
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():505-516. PubMed ID: 25218330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new web-based framework development for fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making.
    Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():601. PubMed ID: 27247897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
    Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-criteria decision support framework for sustainable implementation of effective green supply chain management practices.
    Boutkhoum O; Hanine M; Boukhriss H; Agouti T; Tikniouine A
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):664. PubMed ID: 27350904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prioritizing of sectors for establishing a sustainable industrial symbiosis network with Pythagorean fuzzy AHP- Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method: a case of industrial park in Ankara.
    Yazıcı E; Alakaş HM; Eren T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(31):77875-77889. PubMed ID: 37266781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders management using Fuzzy TOPSIS Assessment of Repetitive Tasks (ART).
    Khandan M; Koohpaei AR; Nili M; Farjami Y
    Work; 2017; 56(2):267-276. PubMed ID: 28234261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.