350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33410910)
1. Evaluation of a Home-Printable Vision Screening Test for Telemedicine.
Crossland MD; Dekker TM; Hancox J; Lisi M; Wemyss TA; Thomas PBM
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 139(3):271-277. PubMed ID: 33410910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of Home Visual Acuity Tests for Telehealth in the COVID-19 Era.
Bellsmith KN; Gale MJ; Yang S; Nguyen IB; Prentiss CJ; Nguyen LT; Mershon S; Summers AI; Thomas M
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 140(5):465-471. PubMed ID: 35357405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork.
Bastawrous A; Rono HK; Livingstone IA; Weiss HA; Jordan S; Kuper H; Burton MJ
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 133(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 26022921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing distance visual acuity measurement with a novel eye chart and the Landolt C chart in a population of children aged 6-18 years.
Gorham JP; Bruce BB; Hutchinson AK
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 37(6):1345-1348. PubMed ID: 27826937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Construction and validation of a Tamil logMAR chart.
Varadharajan S; Srinivasan K; Kumaresan B
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Sep; 29(5):526-534. PubMed ID: 19689549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of an automated-ETDRS near and intermediate visual acuity measurement.
Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):663-667. PubMed ID: 31822041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design and Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test: The K-VA Test.
Karampatakis V; Almaliotis D; Talimtzi P; Almpanidou S
Ophthalmol Ther; 2023 Jun; 12(3):1657-1670. PubMed ID: 36961662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Construction and validation of logMAR visual acuity charts in seven Indian languages.
Negiloni K; Mazumdar D; Neog A; Das B; Medhi J; Choudhury M; George RJ; Ramani KK
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):641-646. PubMed ID: 29676305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of applicability of different visual acuity charts for pediatric outpatient visual tests.
Fang H; Diao H; Chen L; Zeng J
Eye Sci; 2014 Jun; 29(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 26011958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is your vision blurry? A systematic review of home-based visual acuity for telemedicine.
Samanta A; Mauntana S; Barsi Z; Yarlagadda B; Nelson PC
J Telemed Telecare; 2023 Feb; 29(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 33222600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtually controlled computerised visual acuity screening in a multilingual Indian population.
Sreelatha OK; Ramesh SV; Jose J; Devassy M; Srinivasan K
Rural Remote Health; 2014; 14(3):2908. PubMed ID: 25190644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The evaluation of a web-based tool for measuring the uncorrected visual acuity and refractive error in keratoconus eyes: A method comparison study.
Muijzer MB; Claessens JLJ; Cassano F; Godefrooij DA; Prevoo YFDM; Wisse RPL
PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256087. PubMed ID: 34407131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing a Home Vision Self-Assessment Test to Office-Based Snellen Visual Acuity.
Chen TA; Li J; Schallhorn JM; Sun CQ
Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():3205-3211. PubMed ID: 34349497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the visual acuity iPad app Eye Chart Pro compared to the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart in a low-vision population.
Hazari H; Curtis R; Eden K; Hopman WM; Irrcher I; Bona MD
J Telemed Telecare; 2022 Oct; 28(9):680-686. PubMed ID: 32985378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys.
Bourne RR; Rosser DA; Sukudom P; Dineen B; Laidlaw DA; Johnson GJ; Murdoch IE
Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):754-8. PubMed ID: 12928690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability and Discriminatory Power of Chart-Based Visual Function Tests in Individuals With Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A MACUSTAR Study Report.
Dunbar HMP; Behning C; Abdirahman A; Higgins BE; Binns AM; Terheyden JH; Zakaria N; Poor S; Finger RP; Leal S; Holz FG; Schmid M; Crabb DP; Rubin GS; Luhmann UFO;
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 140(8):780-789. PubMed ID: 35737401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Repeatability and reliability of the visual acuity examination on logMAR ETDRS and Snellen chart].
Veselý P; Synek S
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 May; 68(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 22913870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability and Agreement of Visual Acuity Using the ETDRS Number Chart, Landolt C Chart, or ETDRS Alphabet Chart in Eyes With or Without Sight-Threatening Diseases.
Chaikitmongkol V; Nanegrungsunk O; Patikulsila D; Ruamviboonsuk P; Bressler NM
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 136(3):286-290. PubMed ID: 29346499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Brown G; Robson C
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 20444125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of LogMAR Eye charts with angular vision for visually impaired: the Berkeley rudimentary vision test vs LogMAR One target Landolt ring Eye chart.
Miwa M; Iwanami M; Oba MS; Mizuki N; Nishida T
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 251(12):2761-7. PubMed ID: 24057176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]