These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33411175)

  • 1. Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in children: accuracy of nasopharyngeal swab compared to nasopharyngeal aspirate.
    Di Pietro GM; Capecchi E; Luconi E; Lunghi G; Bosis S; Bertolozzi G; Cantoni B; Marano G; Boracchi P; Biganzoli E; Castaldi S; Marchisio P;
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Jun; 40(6):1155-1160. PubMed ID: 33411175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.
    Uddin MKM; Shirin T; Hossain ME; Alam AN; Ami JQ; Hasan R; Miah M; Shaly NJ; Ahmed S; Rahman SMM; Rahman M; Banu S
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0046821. PubMed ID: 34730436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a paediatric cohort.
    Rodrigues J; Gouveia C; Santos MA; Costa O; Côrte-Real R; Brito MJ
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2021 Jul; 57(7):1078-1081. PubMed ID: 33605504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of nasopharyngeal swab and nasopharyngeal aspiration in adults for SARS-CoV-2 identification using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
    Ünsaler S; Okan A; Tekin S; Hafız AM; Gökler O; Altuntaş O
    J Med Virol; 2021 Dec; 93(12):6693-6695. PubMed ID: 34331714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection in HHT patients: nasopharyngeal versus oropharyngeal swab.
    Pagella F; Lizzio R; Ugolini S; Spinozzi G; Maiorano E; Suppressa P; Sabbà C; Matti E
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2020 Dec; 15(1):350. PubMed ID: 33339521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An alternative way to perform diagnostic nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    Matti E; Lizzio R; Spinozzi G; Ugolini S; Maiorano E; Benazzo M; Pagella F
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(2):102828. PubMed ID: 33234296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Sample Pooling for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Nasopharyngeal Swab and Saliva Samples with the Idylla SARS-CoV-2 Test.
    Hofman P; Allegra M; Salah M; Benzaquen J; Tanga V; Bordone O; Fayada J; Long-Mira E; Lassalle S; Lanteri E; Lespinet-Fabre V; Brest P; Mograbi B; Maniel C; Boutros J; Leroy S; Heeke S; Hofman V; Marquette CH; Ilié M
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0099621. PubMed ID: 34756076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A combined oro-nasopharyngeal swab is more sensitive than mouthwash in detecting SARS-CoV-2 by a high-throughput PCR assay.
    Michel W; Färber J; Dilas M; Heuft HG; Tammer I; Baar J; Kaasch AJ
    Infection; 2021 Jun; 49(3):527-531. PubMed ID: 33738680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. YouTube Videos Demonstrating the Nasopharyngeal Swab Technique for SARS-CoV-2 Specimen Collection: Content Analysis.
    Itamura K; Wu A; Illing E; Ting J; Higgins T
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Jan; 7(1):e24220. PubMed ID: 33406478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19.
    Sakanashi D; Asai N; Nakamura A; Miyazaki N; Kawamoto Y; Ohno T; Yamada A; Koita I; Suematsu H; Hagihara M; Shiota A; Kurumiya A; Sakata M; Kato S; Muramatsu Y; Koizumi Y; Kishino T; Ohashi W; Yamagishi Y; Mikamo H
    J Infect Chemother; 2021 Jan; 27(1):126-129. PubMed ID: 33060046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Specimen Types and Saliva Stabilization Solutions for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.
    Griesemer SB; Van Slyke G; Ehrbar D; Strle K; Yildirim T; Centurioni DA; Walsh AC; Chang AK; Waxman MJ; St George K
    J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 59(5):. PubMed ID: 33674284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-Based Detection Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in Asymptomatic Populations.
    Fan G; Qin X; Streblow DN; Hoyos CM; Hansel DE
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0006221. PubMed ID: 34431689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The value of anal swab RT-PCR for COVID-19 diagnosis in adult Indonesian patients.
    Abdullah M; Sudrajat DG; Muzellina VN; Kurniawan J; Rizka A; Utari AP; Pribadi RR; Idrus MF; Yusra Y; Meilany S; Surandy A; Shatri H; Rinaldi I; Pitoyo CW; Renaldi K
    BMJ Open Gastroenterol; 2021 May; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 34011623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection profile of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR in different types of clinical specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bwire GM; Majigo MV; Njiro BJ; Mawazo A
    J Med Virol; 2021 Feb; 93(2):719-725. PubMed ID: 32706393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with self-collected nasal swab
    Lindner AK; Nikolai O; Kausch F; Wintel M; Hommes F; Gertler M; Krüger LJ; Gaeddert M; Tobian F; Lainati F; Köppel L; Seybold J; Corman VM; Drosten C; Hofmann J; Sacks JA; Mockenhaupt FP; Denkinger CM
    Eur Respir J; 2021 Apr; 57(4):. PubMed ID: 33303544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the simultaneous conjunctiva and oropharynx-nasopharynx swab results in patients applying to the SARS-CoV-2 outpatient clinic for the first time.
    Gunduz A; Firat M; Turkoglu G
    J Med Virol; 2021 Jul; 93(7):4516-4522. PubMed ID: 33783859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Testing Compared with Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2.
    Carrouel F; Valette M; Perrier H; Bouscambert-Duchamp M; Dussart C; Tramini P; Bourgeois D
    Viruses; 2021 May; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 34066046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Saliva sample as a non-invasive specimen for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019: a cross-sectional study.
    Pasomsub E; Watcharananan SP; Boonyawat K; Janchompoo P; Wongtabtim G; Suksuwan W; Sungkanuparph S; Phuphuakrat A
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2021 Feb; 27(2):285.e1-285.e4. PubMed ID: 32422408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Gargle, Spit, and Sputum Specimens.
    Poukka E; Mäkelä H; Hagberg L; Vo T; Nohynek H; Ikonen N; Liitsola K; Helve O; Savolainen-Kopra C; Dub T
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0003521. PubMed ID: 34431686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are Posterior Oropharyngeal Saliva Specimens an Acceptable Alternative to Nasopharyngeal Sampling for the Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in Primary-Care Settings?
    Masse S; Bonnet C; Vilcu AM; Benamar H; Swital M; van der Werf S; Carrat F; Hanslik T; Blanchon T; Falchi A
    Viruses; 2021 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 33926069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.