These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Primary mass closure of midline incisions with a continuous polyglyconate monofilament absorbable suture. Gallup DG; Nolan TE; Smith RP Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Nov; 76(5 Pt 1):872-5. PubMed ID: 2216239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A modified incision closure for breast augmentation: remote-knot technique. Wiener TC Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Jan; 33(1):110-2. PubMed ID: 18956221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Modified closure technique for reducing sternal dehiscence; a clinical and in vitro assessment. John LC Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 May; 33(5):769-73. PubMed ID: 18313320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Abdominal wound dehiscence. Hugh TB Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 Mar; 60(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 2183750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Synthetic polyglycomer short-term absorbable sutures vs. polydioxanone long-term absorbable sutures for preventing incisional hernia and wound dehiscence after abdominal wall closure: a comparative randomized study of patients treated for gastric or colon cancer. Ohira G; Kawahira H; Miyauchi H; Suzuki K; Nishimori T; Hanari N; Mori M; Tohma T; Gunji H; Horibe D; Narushima K; Matsubara H Surg Today; 2015 Jul; 45(7):841-5. PubMed ID: 25556881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reduced Rate of Dehiscence After Implementation of a Standardized Fascial Closure Technique in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy. Tolstrup MB; Watt SK; Gögenur I Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):821-826. PubMed ID: 28267697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy wounds. Goligher JC; Irvin TT; Johnston D; De Dombal FT; Hill GL; Horrocks JC Br J Surg; 1975 Oct; 62(10):823-9. PubMed ID: 1104042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Continuous retention suture for the management of open abdomen: a high rate of delayed fascial closure. Gäddnäs F; Saarnio J; Ala-Kokko T; Laurila J; Koivukangas V Scand J Surg; 2007; 96(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 18265858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures. Lubowski D; Hunt D Aust N Z J Surg; 1985 Aug; 55(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 3915865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture. Murtha AP; Kaplan AL; Paglia MJ; Mills BB; Feldstein ML; Ruff GL Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1769-80. PubMed ID: 16651950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Interrupted sutures prevent recurrent abdominal fascial dehiscence: a comparative retrospective single center cohort analysis of risk factors of burst abdomen and its recurrence as well as surgical repair techniques. Mehdorn M; Groos L; Kassahun W; Jansen-Winkeln B; Gockel I; Moulla Y BMC Surg; 2021 Apr; 21(1):208. PubMed ID: 33902549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A new technique for closing abdominal incisions in patients with poor wound healing. Boissel P; Jamart J; Grumillier P; Grosdidier J Am J Surg; 1982 Mar; 143(3):380-1. PubMed ID: 7039381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Wound healing in abdominal operations. Bucknall TE Surg Annu; 1985; 17():1-22. PubMed ID: 3883538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Meta-analysis of skin adhesives versus sutures in closure of laparoscopic port-site wounds. Sajid MS; Siddiqui MR; Khan MA; Baig MK Surg Endosc; 2009 Jun; 23(6):1191-7. PubMed ID: 19263132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Polyglycolic acid (Dexon) versus silk for fascial closure of abdominal incisions. Kronborg O Acta Chir Scand; 1976; 142(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 773068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]