These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33413296)
1. Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement. Sahrmann P; Winkler S; Gubler A; Attin T BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):25. PubMed ID: 33413296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy. Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of piezoelectric ultrasonic instrumentation on titanium discs: a microscopy and trace elemental analysis in vitro study. Tawse-Smith A; Atieh MA; Tompkins G; Duncan WJ; Reid MR; Stirling CH Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 14(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 26094557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment with various ultrasonic scaler tips affects efficiency of brushing of SLA titanium discs. Park JB; Jang YJ; Choi BK; Kim KK; Ko Y J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):e119-23. PubMed ID: 23524804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasonic Instrument Effects on Different Implant Surfaces: Profilometry, Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy, and Microbiology In Vitro Study. Faccioni F; Bevilacqua L; Porrelli D; Khoury A; Faccioni P; Turco G; Frassetto A; Maglione M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):520-528. PubMed ID: 34115066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In Vitro Comparison of Titanium Disc Surface Roughness and Bacterial Colonization After Ultrasonic Instrumentation With Three Different Tips. Kitaygorodskiy A; Gregory RL; Lim G; Hamada Y J Oral Implantol; 2024 Oct; 50(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 39023858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic implant scaler tips manufactured by the powder injection molding technique. Chun KA; Kum KY; Lee WC; Baek SH; Choi HW; Shon WJ BMC Oral Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):110. PubMed ID: 28697771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Instrumentation With Ultrasonic Scalers Facilitates Cleaning of the Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Titanium Implants. Park JB; Lee SH; Kim N; Park S; Jin SH; Choi BK; Kim KK; Ko Y J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 24552131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Titanium particles generated during ultrasonic scaling of implants. Harrel SK; Wilson TG; Pandya M; Diekwisch TGH J Periodontol; 2019 Mar; 90(3):241-246. PubMed ID: 30312471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic ultrasonic scaler tip on titanium surfaces. Baek SH; Shon WJ; Bae KS; Kum KY; Lee WC; Park YS Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1269-74. PubMed ID: 22093039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments. Mengel R; Meer C; Flores-de-Jacoby L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments. Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surface alterations of several dental materials by a novel ultrasonic scaler tip. Seol HW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Baek SH; Lee SY Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):801-10. PubMed ID: 22848881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of plastic-covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces. Mann M; Parmar D; Walmsley AD; Lea SC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21488970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of peri-implantitis]. Espedito Di Lauro A; Morgese F; Squillace A; Ramaglia L Minerva Stomatol; 2003; 52(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12686908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Mechanical Instrumentation with Commercially Available Instruments Used in Supportive Peri-implant Therapy: An In Vitro Study. Sirinirund B; Garaicoa-Pazmino C; Wang HL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 31711078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of roughness of titanium surfaces treated by different hygiene instruments. Unursaikhan O; Lee JS; Cha JK; Park JC; Jung UW; Kim CS; Cho KS; Choi SH J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2012 Jun; 42(3):88-94. PubMed ID: 22803010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The maintenance of inserted titanium implants: in-vitro evaluation of exposed surfaces cleaned with three different instruments. Bertoldi C; Lusuardi D; Battarra F; Sassatelli P; Spinato S; Zaffe D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jan; 28(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 26744027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of subgingival implant surfaces with Teflon-coated sonic and ultrasonic scaler tips and various implant curettes. An in vitro study. Rühling A; Kocher T; Kreusch J; Plagmann HC Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Mar; 5(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 8038341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of confocal microscopy for quantification of plastic remnants on rough titanium after instrumentation and evaluation of efficacy of removal. Yang SM; Park JB; Ko Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 26009902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]