These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33413390)

  • 1. Measuring the impact of spatial perturbations on the relationship between data privacy and validity of descriptive statistics.
    Broen K; Trangucci R; Zelner J
    Int J Health Geogr; 2021 Jan; 20(1):3. PubMed ID: 33413390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Street masking: a network-based geographic mask for easily protecting geoprivacy.
    Swanlund D; Schuurman N; Zandbergen P; Brussoni M
    Int J Health Geogr; 2020 Jul; 19(1):26. PubMed ID: 32631351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mapping health data: improved privacy protection with donut method geomasking.
    Hampton KH; Fitch MK; Allshouse WB; Doherty IA; Gesink DC; Leone PA; Serre ML; Miller WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 172(9):1062-9. PubMed ID: 20817785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use and Understanding of Anonymization and De-Identification in the Biomedical Literature: Scoping Review.
    Chevrier R; Foufi V; Gaudet-Blavignac C; Robert A; Lovis C
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e13484. PubMed ID: 31152528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Balancing geo-privacy and spatial patterns in epidemiological studies.
    Chen CC; Chuang JH; Wang DW; Wang CM; Lin BC; Chan TC
    Geospat Health; 2017 Nov; 12(2):573. PubMed ID: 29239562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proposal and Assessment of a De-Identification Strategy to Enhance Anonymity of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP-CDM) in a Public Cloud-Computing Environment: Anonymization of Medical Data Using Privacy Models.
    Jeon S; Seo J; Kim S; Lee J; Kim JH; Sohn JW; Moon J; Joo HJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Nov; 22(11):e19597. PubMed ID: 33177037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geomasking sensitive health data and privacy protection: an evaluation using an E911 database.
    Allshouse WB; Fitch MK; Hampton KH; Gesink DC; Doherty IA; Leone PA; Serre ML; Miller WC
    Geocarto Int; 2010 Oct; 25(6):443-452. PubMed ID: 20953360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Daily activity locations k-anonymity for the evaluation of disclosure risk of individual GPS datasets.
    Wang J; Kwan MP
    Int J Health Geogr; 2020 Mar; 19(1):7. PubMed ID: 32138736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The verified neighbor approach to geoprivacy: An improved method for geographic masking.
    Richter W
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 28(2):109-118. PubMed ID: 28930296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Privacy preserving data anonymization of spontaneous ADE reporting system dataset.
    Lin WY; Yang DC; Wang JT
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jul; 16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):58. PubMed ID: 27454754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Privacy protection of medical data in social network.
    Su J; Cao Y; Chen Y; Liu Y; Song J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Oct; 21(Suppl 1):286. PubMed ID: 34663276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient Privacy in the Era of Big Data.
    Kayaalp M
    Balkan Med J; 2018 Jan; 35(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 28903886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A context-sensitive approach to anonymizing spatial surveillance data: impact on outbreak detection.
    Cassa CA; Grannis SJ; Overhage JM; Mandl KD
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2006; 13(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 16357353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utility-preserving anonymization for health data publishing.
    Lee H; Kim S; Kim JW; Chung YD
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jul; 17(1):104. PubMed ID: 28693480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comprehensive tool for creating and evaluating privacy-preserving biomedical prediction models.
    Eicher J; Bild R; Spengler H; Kuhn KA; Prasser F
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Feb; 20(1):29. PubMed ID: 32046701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel on-line spatial-temporal k-anonymity method for location privacy protection from sequence rules-based inference attacks.
    Zhang H; Wu C; Chen Z; Liu Z; Zhu Y
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182232. PubMed ID: 28767687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the Anonymity and Utility of De-Identified Clinical Data Based on Japanese Anonymization Criteria.
    Kimura E; Hasegawa S; Chida K; Gamo S; Irino S; Ishida H; Kurihara Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():1303. PubMed ID: 29295386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Privacy of Study Participants in Open-access Health and Demographic Surveillance System Data: Requirements Analysis for Data Anonymization.
    Templ M; Kanjala C; Siems I
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2022 Sep; 8(9):e34472. PubMed ID: 36053573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differentially private release of medical microdata: an efficient and practical approach for preserving informative attribute values.
    Lee H; Chung YD
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jul; 20(1):155. PubMed ID: 32641043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Experimental Comparison of Quality Models for Health Data De-Identification.
    Eicher J; Kuhn KA; Prasser F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():704-708. PubMed ID: 29295189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.