These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33413483)
1. Assessing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L, the Oxford Hip Score, and the Oxford Knee Score in the NHS patient-reported outcome measures. Kang S J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jan; 16(1):18. PubMed ID: 33413483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine tool to select candidates for hip and knee replacement surgery: development and economic modelling. Price A; Smith J; Dakin H; Kang S; Eibich P; Cook J; Gray A; Harris K; Middleton R; Gibbons E; Benedetto E; Smith S; Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Sayers A; Miller L; Marques E; Gooberman-Hill R; Blom A; Judge A; Arden N; Murray D; Glyn-Jones S; Barker K; Carr A; Beard D Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(32):1-216. PubMed ID: 31287051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Associations between preoperative Oxford hip and knee scores and costs and quality of life of patients undergoing primary total joint replacement in the NHS England: an observational study. Eibich P; Dakin HA; Price AJ; Beard D; Arden NK; Gray AM BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e019477. PubMed ID: 29643154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do Patient-reported Outcome Scores in International Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries Compare? Ingelsrud LH; Wilkinson JM; Overgaard S; Rolfson O; Hallstrom B; Navarro RA; Terner M; Karmakar-Hore S; Webster G; Slawomirski L; Sayers A; Kendir C; de Bienassis K; Klazinga N; Dahl AW; Bohm E Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1884-1896. PubMed ID: 35901444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of EQ-5D, howRu and Oxford hip & knee scores in assessing the outcome of hip and knee replacements. Benson T; Williams DH; Potts HW BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Sep; 16(1):512. PubMed ID: 27659761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metabolic syndrome and patient-reported outcome two years after hip and knee arthroplasty. Sørensen RR; Timm S; Rasmussen LE; Brasen CL; Varnum C Bone Joint J; 2024 Oct; 106-B(10):1074-1083. PubMed ID: 39348914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-10 Global Health and EQ-5D questionnaires in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Shim J; Hamilton DF Bone Joint J; 2019 Jul; 101-B(7):832-837. PubMed ID: 31256677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of crosswalks for converting patient-reported outcome measure scores in hip, knee, and shoulder replacement surgery. Ackerman IN; Soh SE; Hallstrom BR; Fang YY; Franklin P; Lützner J; Ingelsrud LH; Acta Orthop; 2024 Sep; 95():512-523. PubMed ID: 39268815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating change using patient-reported outcome measures in knee replacement: the complementary nature of the EQ-5D index and VAS scores. Lin FJ; Samp J; Munoz A; Wong PS; Pickard AS Eur J Health Econ; 2014 Jun; 15(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 23765331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early patient-reported outcomes from primary hip and knee arthroplasty have improved over the past seven years : an analysis of the NHS PROMs dataset. Sabah SA; Knight R; Alvand A; Beard DJ; Price AJ Bone Joint J; 2022 Jun; 104-B(6):687-695. PubMed ID: 35638211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS stand-alone component and Oxford knee score in the Australian knee arthroplasty population utilising minimally important difference, concurrent validity, predictive validity and responsiveness. Lin DY; Cheok TS; Kaambwa B; Samson AJ; Morrison C; Chan T; Kroon HM; Jaarsma RL Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 May; 21(1):41. PubMed ID: 37165364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mapping analysis to predict EQ-5D-5 L utility values based on the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaires in the Spanish population suffering from lower limb osteoarthritis. Martín-Fernández J; Morey-Montalvo M; Tomás-García N; Martín-Ramos E; Muñoz-García JC; Polentinos-Castro E; Rodríguez-Martínez G; Arenaza JC; García-Pérez L; Magdalena-Armas L; Bilbao A Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jun; 18(1):184. PubMed ID: 32539838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision knee arthroplasty. Sabah SA; Alvand A; Beard DJ; Price AJ Bone Joint J; 2021 Apr; 103-B(4):627-634. PubMed ID: 33789485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 'Worse than death' and waiting for a joint arthroplasty. Scott CEH; MacDonald DJ; Howie CR Bone Joint J; 2019 Aug; 101-B(8):941-950. PubMed ID: 31362549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): thresholds for the EQ-5D-5L and Oxford hip and knee scores for patients with total hip and knee replacement. Conner-Spady BL; Marshall DA; Bohm E; Dunbar MJ; Loucks L; Noseworthy TW Qual Life Res; 2023 Feb; 32(2):519-530. PubMed ID: 36367656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Poor Knee-specific and Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores at 6 Months Are Associated With Early Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Ackerman IN; Harris IA; Cashman K; Rowden N; Lorimer M; Graves SE Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 35901436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Crosswalks between the Oxford hip and knee scores and the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments. Soh SE; Harris IA; Cashman K; Graves SE; Ackerman IN Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2022 Apr; 30(4):570-577. PubMed ID: 35081452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Socioeconomic inequalities in patient-reported outcome measures of Dutch primary hip and knee arthroplasty patients for osteoarthritis. Bonsel JM; Reijman M; Verhaar JAN; van Steenbergen LN; Janssen MF; Bonsel GJ Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2024 Feb; 32(2):200-209. PubMed ID: 37482250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in patients following total hip or knee replacement. Jin X; Al Sayah F; Ohinmaa A; Marshall DA; Johnson JA Qual Life Res; 2019 Sep; 28(9):2409-2417. PubMed ID: 31089988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of comorbidities on the safety and effectiveness of hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. Podmore B; Hutchings A; Skinner JA; MacGregor AJ; van der Meulen J Bone Joint J; 2021 Jan; 103-B(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 33380188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]