147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33413695)
1. Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.
Malmqvist J; Siersma V; Bang CW; Brodersen J
BMC Psychol; 2021 Jan; 9(1):7. PubMed ID: 33413695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consequences of screening in cervical cancer: development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.
Brodersen J; Siersma V; Thorsen H
BMC Psychol; 2018 Aug; 6(1):39. PubMed ID: 30097013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.
Toft EL; Kaae SE; Malmqvist J; Brodersen J
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2019 Jun; 37(2):145-154. PubMed ID: 31079520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Consequences of screening in lung cancer: development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.
Brodersen J; Thorsen H; Kreiner S
Value Health; 2010 Aug; 13(5):601-12. PubMed ID: 20345552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric properties of the SCREESCO questionnaire used in a colorectal cancer screening programme-A Rasch analysis.
Jervaeus A; Fritzell K; Hultcrantz R; Wengström Y; Kottorp A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 26(2):541-550. PubMed ID: 31758613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the psychosocial consequences of screening in lung cancer questionnaire in the international lung screen trial Australian cohort.
Bonney A; Brodersen J; Siersma V; See K; Marshall HM; Steinfort D; Irving L; Lin L; Li J; Pang S; Fogarty P; Brims F; McWilliams A; Stone E; Lam S; Fong KM; Manser R
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2024 Jan; 22(1):10. PubMed ID: 38273370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptation to Swedish and further development of the 'Consequences of Screening - Breast Cancer' questionnaire: a multimethod study.
Bolejko A; Wann-Hansson C; Zackrisson S; Brodersen J; Hagell P
Scand J Caring Sci; 2013 Jun; 27(2):475-86. PubMed ID: 22804720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consequences of screening in abdominal aortic aneurysm: development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.
Brodersen J; Hansson A; Johansson M; Siersma V; Langenskiöld M; Pettersson M
J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2017; 2():37. PubMed ID: 30238082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QoL) and the adjusted DSWAL-QoL (aDSWAL-QoL) using item analysis with the Rasch model: a pilot study.
Simpelaere IS; Van Nuffelen G; De Bodt M; Vanderwegen J; Hansen T
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):66. PubMed ID: 28388899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.
Meng R; Li J; Wang Z; Zhang D; Liu B; Luo Y; Hu Y; Yu C
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Mar; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 32169070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for colorectal cancer screening.
Kharameh ZT; Foroozanfar S; Zamanian H
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(11):4595-9. PubMed ID: 24969891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC): development of a questionnaire.
Brodersen J; Thorsen H
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2008; 26(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 19034808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
Groenvold M
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-cultural validity and psychometric properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire in a clinical refugee sample.
Nielsen T; Elklit A; Vang ML; Nielsen SB; Auning-Hansen M; Palic S
Eur J Psychotraumatol; 2023; 14(1):2172256. PubMed ID: 37052113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Traditional and Rasch psychometric analyses of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) questionnaire in shorter-term cancer survivors 15 months post-diagnosis.
Ashley L; Smith AB; Jones H; Velikova G; Wright P
J Psychosom Res; 2014 Oct; 77(4):322-9. PubMed ID: 25190179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using Rasch Analysis to Assess and Improve the Measurement Properties of a Questionnaire With Few Items: The York Binaural Hearing-Related Quality of Life (YBHRQL) Questionnaire.
Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1526-1539. PubMed ID: 37358331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.
Warren Andersen S; Blot WJ; Lipworth L; Steinwandel M; Murff HJ; Zheng W
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Dec; 2(12):e1917995. PubMed ID: 31860105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the Patient Activation Measure a valid measure of osteoarthritis self-management attitudes and capabilities? Results of a Rasch analysis.
Eyles JP; Ferreira M; Mills K; Lucas BR; Robbins SR; Williams M; Lee H; Appleton S; Hunter DJ
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 May; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 32370751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent advances in analysis of differential item functioning in health research using the Rasch model.
Hagquist C; Andrich D
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Sep; 15(1):181. PubMed ID: 28927468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A stitch in time saves nine: Perceptions about colorectal cancer screening after a non-cancer colonoscopy result. Qualitative study.
Kirkegaard P; Edwards A; Andersen B
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Jul; 102(7):1373-1379. PubMed ID: 30853142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
