These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33413829)
1. Aseptic Disposable Stethoscope Barrier: Acoustically Invisible and Superior to Disposable Stethoscopes. Kalra S; Garri RF; Shewale JB Mayo Clin Proc; 2021 Jan; 96(1):263-264. PubMed ID: 33413829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stethoscope hygiene: A call to action. Recommendations to update the CDC guidelines. Kalra S; Amin A; Albert N; Cadwell C; Edmonson C; Gaynes R; Hand M; Marinella M; Morely C; Sieck S; Vasudevan RS Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 42(6):740-742. PubMed ID: 34009112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stethoscope barriers narrative review; It's time for a strategy unfriendly to multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). Peacock WF; Dhand A; Albert NM; Shahid Z; Luk A; Vollman K; Schoppelrey RB; Cadwell C; Dadwal S; Amin AN; Torriani FJ J Infect Public Health; 2024 Jun; 17(6):1001-1006. PubMed ID: 38636310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aseptic Stethoscope Barriers Prevent Peacock WF; Kalra S; Vasudevan RS; Torriani F Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes; 2021 Feb; 5(1):103-108. PubMed ID: 33718789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An inexpensive, sterile and disposable praecordial stethoscope. Ho AM; Go W Anaesth Intensive Care; 2015 Jan; 43(1):135-6. PubMed ID: 25579305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital Stethoscope-Improved Auscultation at the Bedside. Silverman B; Balk M Am J Cardiol; 2019 Mar; 123(6):984-985. PubMed ID: 30630590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of conventional and sensor-based electronic stethoscopes in detecting cardiac murmurs of dogs. Vörös K; Bonnevie A; Reiczigel J Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2012 Apr; 40(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22526814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The stethoscope: some preliminary investigations. Welsby PD; Parry G; Smith D Postgrad Med J; 2003 Dec; 79(938):695-8. PubMed ID: 14707247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auscultation in flight: comparison of conventional and electronic stethoscopes. Tourtier JP; Libert N; Clapson P; Tazarourte K; Borne M; Grasser L; Debien B; Auroy Y Air Med J; 2011; 30(3):158-60. PubMed ID: 21549289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stethoscope, "the friendly foe" - A study to evaluate bacterial contamination of stethoscopes and disinfection practices. Datta P; Kaur M; Rawat S; Gupta V; Chander J J Infect Dev Ctries; 2018 Oct; 12(10):887-893. PubMed ID: 32004158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bacteriological assessment of stethoscopes used by healthcare workers in a tertiary care centre of Nepal. Thapa S; Sapkota LB BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jul; 10(1):353. PubMed ID: 28754177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical comparison of acoustic and electronic stethoscopes and design of a new electronic stethoscope. Grenier MC; Gagnon K; Genest J; Durand J; Durand LG Am J Cardiol; 1998 Mar; 81(5):653-6. PubMed ID: 9514471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]