These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3341411)

  • 1. Gestational age and fetal biophysical assessment.
    Baskett TF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Feb; 158(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 3341411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death.
    Baskett TF; Allen AC; Gray JH; Young DC; Young LM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):357-60. PubMed ID: 3306498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biophysical profile for antepartum fetal assessment.
    Norman LA; Karp LE
    Am Fam Physician; 1986 Oct; 34(4):83-9. PubMed ID: 3532741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal biophysical profile and the effect of premature rupture of the membranes.
    Vintzileos AM; Feinstein SJ; Lodeiro JG; Campbell WA; Weinbaum PJ; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jun; 67(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 3517724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal biophysical profile in twin gestations.
    Lodeiro JG; Vintzileos AM; Feinstein SJ; Campbell WA; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jun; 67(6):824-7. PubMed ID: 3517725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Ingardia CJ; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 6877682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-assisted assessment of the fetal biophysical profile.
    Devoe LD; Searle N; Searle J; Phillips M; Castillo RA; Saad S; Sherline DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 153(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 3901767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomised controlled trial of simple compared with complex antenatal fetal monitoring after 42 weeks of gestation.
    Alfirevic Z; Walkinshaw SA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Aug; 102(8):638-43. PubMed ID: 7654642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
    Platt LD; Eglinton GS; Sipos L; Broussard PM; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of observation of fetal breathing activity in antenatal assessment of high-risk pregnancy.
    Devoe LD; Ruedrich DA; Searle NS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jan; 160(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 2519510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The fetal biophysical profile in pregnancies with grade III placentas.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Feinstein SJ; Lodeiro JG; Weinbaum PJ; Nochimson DJ
    Am J Perinatol; 1987 Apr; 4(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 3566887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A modified biophysical profile for antenatal fetal surveillance.
    Eden RD; Seifert LS; Kodack LD; Trofatter KF; Killam AP; Gall SA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):365-9. PubMed ID: 3279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
    Platt LD; Walla CA; Paul RH; Trujillo ME; Loesser CV; Jacobs ND; Broussard PM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal congenital malformations. Biophysical profile evaluation.
    Lin CC; Adamczyk CJ; Sheikh Z; Mittendorf R
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Jun; 43(6):521-7. PubMed ID: 9653699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Nonstress test, contraction stress test, and biophysical profile.
    Babbitt NE
    S D J Med; 1996 Nov; 49(11):403-8. PubMed ID: 8973133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between the quantity and quality of prenatal movements in pregnancies complicated by intra-uterine growth retardation and premature rupture of the membranes.
    Sival DA; Visser GH; Prechtl HF
    Early Hum Dev; 1992 Oct; 30(3):193-209. PubMed ID: 1468383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Prolonged pregnancy: pathophysiology and clinical aspects].
    Schneider H; Herrmann U
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Jan; 50(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 2179044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the fetal assessment score in pregnancies at risk for intrauterine hypoxia.
    Arabin B; Snyjders R; Mohnhaupt A; Ragosch V; Nicolaides K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 169(3):549-54. PubMed ID: 8372860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting poor neonatal outcome: a comparative study of noninvasive antenatal testing methods.
    Dubinsky T; Lau M; Powell F; Garcia J; Mastobattista J; Parvey HR; Sickler K; Maklad N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):827-31. PubMed ID: 9057543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.