BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33414244)

  • 1. Refractive accuracy in eyes undergoing combined cataract extraction and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
    Campbell JA; Ladas JG; Wang K; Woreta F; Srikumaran D
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 106(5):623-627. PubMed ID: 33414244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas in cataract patients with steep corneal curvature.
    Zhang C; Dai G; Pazo EE; Xu L; Wu X; Zhang H; Lin T; He W
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241630. PubMed ID: 33216749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Intraocular lens power calculation for high myopic eyes with cataract: comparison of three formulas].
    Zhu XJ; He WW; Du Y; Qian DJ; Dai JH; Lu Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 53(4):260-265. PubMed ID: 28412798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Patients With Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation With Optic Capture in Berger Space for Pediatric Cataract.
    Wang M; Li D; Fan Z; Zhang J; Zhou J; Huang Y
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2023; 60(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 35611823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Algorithmic intraocular lens power calculation formula selection by keratometry, anterior chamber depth and axial length.
    Kim JW; Eom Y; Yoon EG; Choi Y; Song JS; Jeong JW; Park SK; Kim HM
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 100(3):e701-e709. PubMed ID: 34378871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. IOL Power Calculation in Eyes Undergoing Combined Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Cataract Surgery.
    Knutsson KA; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Lupardi E; Bertuzzi F; Taroni L; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Paganoni G; Rama P
    J Refract Surg; 2022 Jul; 38(7):435-442. PubMed ID: 35858193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimizing intraocular lens power calculation using adjusted conventional keratometry for cataract surgery combined with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
    Diener R; Treder M; Lauermann JL; Eter N; Alnawaiseh M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 260(9):3087-3093. PubMed ID: 35258717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation for cataract surgery after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
    Pellegrini M; Furiosi L; Salgari N; D'Angelo S; Zauli G; Yu AC; Busin M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 50(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 34845828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard vs total keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery combined with DMEK.
    Khan A; Rangu N; Murphy DA; Cooke DL; Siatkowski RL; Mittal A; Wendelstein JA; Riaz KM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Mar; 49(3):239-245. PubMed ID: 36804866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by intraocular lens power calculation formulas in high myopia.
    Zhou D; Sun Z; Deng G
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 67(4):484-489. PubMed ID: 30900579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Formulas Modified for Patients with Keratoconus.
    Kane JX; Connell B; Yip H; McAlister JC; Beckingsale P; Snibson GR; Chan E
    Ophthalmology; 2020 Aug; 127(8):1037-1042. PubMed ID: 32279887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toric intraocular lens power calculation in cataract patients with keratoconus.
    Ton Y; Barrett GD; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Assia EI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Nov; 47(11):1389-1397. PubMed ID: 33770295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of anterior chamber depth on the choice of intraocular lens calculation formula in patients with normal axial length.
    Miraftab M; Hashemi H; Fotouhi A; Khabazkhoob M; Rezvan F; Asgari S
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2014; 21(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 25371635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Challenges in pediatric cataract surgery: comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using optical biometry.
    Yılmaz İE; Kimyon S; Mete A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 42(10):3071-3077. PubMed ID: 35362808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using a swept-source optical biometer.
    Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim NR; Chin HS; Jung JW
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227638. PubMed ID: 31935241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas.
    Jeong J; Song H; Lee JK; Chuck RS; Kwon JW
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 28464806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Alternative method of intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length].
    Belov DF; Nikolaenko VP
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2022; 138(3):24-28. PubMed ID: 35801876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoperative aberrometry versus preoperative biometry for intraocular lens power selection in patients with axial hyperopia.
    Bansal M; Thakur A; Gupta G; Jurangal A; Khanna R; Malhotra C; Gupta A; Jain AK
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 70(12):4295-4299. PubMed ID: 36453332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas based on the new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry].
    Deng XH; Chang PJ; Huang JH; Wang DD; Zhao YY; Ding XX; Zhao YE
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 57(7):502-511. PubMed ID: 34256470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the accuracy of 11 intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
    Carmona-González D; Castillo-Gómez A; Palomino-Bautista C; Romero-Domínguez M; Gutiérrez-Moreno MÁ
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 31(5):2370-2376. PubMed ID: 33054421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.