These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33414879)

  • 1. A Comparison of United States Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test and Combat Fitness Test Results.
    Keefer M; Debeliso M
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2020; 13(4):1741-1755. PubMed ID: 33414879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decreased Percent Body Fat but Not Body Mass is Associated with Better Performance on Combat Fitness Test in Male and Female Marines.
    Pletcher ER; Lovalekar M; Coleman LC; Beals K; Nindl BC; Allison KF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2023 Apr; 37(4):887-893. PubMed ID: 36026495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 300 Marines: characterizing the US Marines with perfect scores on their physical and combat fitness tests.
    Looney DP; Potter AW; Schafer EA; Chapman CL; Friedl KE
    Front Physiol; 2024; 15():1406749. PubMed ID: 38957215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. United States Marine Corps Recruit Training Demands Associated With Performance Outcomes.
    McFadden BA; Cintineo HP; Chandler AJ; Peterson P; Lovalekar M; Nindl BC; Arent SM
    Mil Med; 2024 Jun; 189(Supplement_2):84-93. PubMed ID: 38920040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unsupervised Machine Learning in Countermovement Jump and Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull Performance Produces Distinct Combat and Physical Fitness Clusters in Male and Female U.S. Marine Corps Recruits.
    Peterson PA; Lovalekar M; Cruz DE; Steele E; McFadden B; Cintineo H; Arent SM; Nindl BC
    Mil Med; 2024 Jun; 189(Supplement_2):38-46. PubMed ID: 38920035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fight load index and body composition are most associated with combat fitness in female Marines.
    Allison KF; Keenan KA; Lovalekar M; Mi Q; Beals K; Coleman LCLC; Nindl BC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2019 Apr; 22(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 30448087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Greater ankle strength, anaerobic and aerobic capacity, and agility predict Ground Combat Military Occupational School graduation in female Marines.
    Allison KF; Keenan KA; Wohleber MF; Perlsweig KA; Pletcher ER; Lovalekar M; Beals K; Coleman LC; Nindl BC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S85-S90. PubMed ID: 28899656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A descriptive study of the U.S. Marine Corps fitness tests (2000-2012).
    Bartlett JL; Phillips J; Galarneau MR
    Mil Med; 2015 May; 180(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 25939104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance differences between male and female marines on standardized physical fitness tests and combat proxy tasks: identifying the gap.
    Jameson J; Pappa L; McGuire B; Kelly KR
    US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():12-21. PubMed ID: 26159007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physical performance and body composition reference values for modern US Marine Corps women.
    Potter AW; Looney DP; Tharion WJ; Nindl LJ; Pazmino A; Soto LD; Arcidiacono DM; Friedl KE
    BMJ Nutr Prev Health; 2023; 6(2):234-242. PubMed ID: 38618530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fitness Measures Among Boy Scouts Completing the Personal Fitness Merit Badge.
    Arena S; Riley L; Schilz G; Schultz E; Watterworth B; Peterson E
    Cureus; 2018 Apr; 10(4):e2538. PubMed ID: 29946506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CK-MM Polymorphism is Associated With Physical Fitness Test Scores in Military Recruits.
    Sprouse C; Tosi LL; Gordish-Dressman H; Abdel-Ghani MS; Panchapakesan K; Niederberger B; Devaney JM; Kelly KR
    Mil Med; 2015 Sep; 180(9):1001-5. PubMed ID: 26327553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional movement screen and aerobic fitness predict injuries in military training.
    Lisman P; O'Connor FG; Deuster PA; Knapik JJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Apr; 45(4):636-43. PubMed ID: 23190584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Body Composition Metrics for United States Air Force Airmen.
    Griffith JR; White ED; Fass RD; Lucas BM
    Mil Med; 2018 Mar; 183(3-4):e201-e207. PubMed ID: 29365181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical fitness profile of Army ROTC cadets.
    Thomas DQ; Lumpp SA; Schreiber JA; Keith JA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2004 Nov; 18(4):904-7. PubMed ID: 15574107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors of trainability and predictability associated with military physical fitness test success.
    Cuddy JS; Slivka DR; Hailes WS; Ruby BC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Dec; 25(12):3486-94. PubMed ID: 22080323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in combat task performance under increasing loads in active duty marines.
    Jaworski RL; Jensen A; Niederberger B; Congalton R; Kelly KR
    Mil Med; 2015 Mar; 180(3 Suppl):179-86. PubMed ID: 25747650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Functional Movement Screen and Self-reported Injury in Senior Military College Cadets.
    Hand AF; Hong S; Pfeifer CE; Stodden DF; Haugen KH; Terlizzi BM; Abrams TC; Yee K; Spaulding D; Dubina M; Bellon CR; Grieve GL; Sole CJ; Sacko RS
    Mil Med; 2024 Jan; 189(1-2):e242-e249. PubMed ID: 37506177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between fire fighting suppression tasks and physical fitness.
    Williford HN; Duey WJ; Olson MS; Howard R; Wang N
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1179-86. PubMed ID: 10503052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Warm-ups for military fitness testing: rapid evidence assessment of the literature.
    Zeno SA; Purvis D; Crawford C; Lee C; Lisman P; Deuster PA
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Jul; 45(7):1369-76. PubMed ID: 23777958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.