These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33415712)

  • 1. Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm.
    Li Z; Tong M; Chen S; Qian J
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):747-757. PubMed ID: 33415712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial attention based on 2D location and relative depth order modulates visual working memory in a 3D environment.
    Fang W; Wang K; Zhang K; Qian J
    Br J Psychol; 2023 Feb; 114(1):112-131. PubMed ID: 36161427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of retro-cue validity on working memory representation: Evidence from electroencephalograms.
    Fu X; Ye C; Hu Z; Li Z; Liang T; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2022 Apr; 170():108320. PubMed ID: 35337895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Invalid retro-cues can eliminate the retro-cue benefit: Evidence for a hybridized account.
    Gözenman F; Tanoue RT; Metoyer T; Berryhill ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1748-54. PubMed ID: 25045904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the robustness of feature-based selection in visual working memory.
    Arnicane A; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 May; 47(5):731-758. PubMed ID: 34264730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.
    Gunseli E; van Moorselaar D; Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1334-41. PubMed ID: 25563713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the prioritization of items and feature-dimensions in visual working memory.
    Hajonides JE; van Ede F; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    J Vis; 2020 Aug; 20(8):25. PubMed ID: 32841318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 26752731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of retro-cue benefits with extensive practice: Implications for capacity estimation and attentional states in visual working memory.
    Zerr P; Gayet S; van den Esschert F; Kappen M; Olah Z; Van der Stigchel S
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):1036-1049. PubMed ID: 33616865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory.
    Fan L; Zhang L; Diao L; Xu M; Chen R; Zhang X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):459-470. PubMed ID: 32988297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shifting attention among working memory representations: testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control.
    Berryhill ME; Richmond LL; Shay CS; Olson IR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):426-38. PubMed ID: 21846267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance.
    Wang B; Yan C; Wang Z; Olivers CNL; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1261-1267. PubMed ID: 27896633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orienting Attention to Auditory and Visual Short-term Memory: The Roles of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognitive Status.
    Garami L; Chow R; Fakuade A; Swaminathan S; Alain C
    Exp Aging Res; 2020; 46(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 31750789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for the effect of depth on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Li J; Wang K; Liu S; Lei Q
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6408. PubMed ID: 28744002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working memory for stereoscopic depth is limited and imprecise-evidence from a change detection task.
    Qian J; Zhang K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1657-1665. PubMed ID: 31388836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tracking attentional states: Assessing the relationship between sustained and selective focused attention in visual working memory.
    Arnicane A; Souza AS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):715-738. PubMed ID: 35297019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two distinct mechanisms of selection in working memory: Additive last-item and retro-cue benefits.
    Niklaus M; Singmann H; Oberauer K
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():282-302. PubMed ID: 30551034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.