These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33415716)

  • 1. Examining the relationship between generation constraint and memory.
    McCurdy MP; Frankenstein AN; Sklenar AM; Levy PU; Leshikar ED
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):675-691. PubMed ID: 33415716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fewer generation constraints increase the generation effect for item and source memory through enhanced relational processing.
    McCurdy MP; Sklenar AM; Frankenstein AN; Leshikar ED
    Memory; 2020 May; 28(5):598-616. PubMed ID: 32292105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lower constraint testing enhances the testing effect for some contextual details but not others.
    Giannakopoulos KL; McCurdy MP; Sklenar AM; Frankenstein AN; Urban Levy P; Leshikar ED
    Brain Behav; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e3380. PubMed ID: 38376029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theories of the generation effect and the impact of generation constraint: A meta-analytic review.
    McCurdy MP; Viechtbauer W; Sklenar AM; Frankenstein AN; Leshikar ED
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1139-1165. PubMed ID: 32671573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generation and memory for contextual detail.
    Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):838-55. PubMed ID: 15238028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dopamine Enhances Item Novelty Detection via Hippocampal and Associative Recall via Left Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Mechanisms.
    Clos M; Bunzeck N; Sommer T
    J Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 39(40):7920-7933. PubMed ID: 31405927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The negative generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon.
    Schmidt SR; Cherry K
    Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):359-69. PubMed ID: 2725272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanisms of word concreteness effects in explicit memory: Does context availability play a role?
    Taylor RS; Francis WS; Borunda-Vazquez L; Carbajal J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):169-181. PubMed ID: 30182327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selecting effectively contributes to the mnemonic benefits of self-generated cues.
    Tullis JG; Fraundorf SH
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):765-781. PubMed ID: 34731430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generation and context memory.
    Mulligan NW; Lozito JP; Rosner ZA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):836-46. PubMed ID: 16822151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When does generation enhance memory for location?
    Marsh EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1216-20. PubMed ID: 16938059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sans Forgetica is not desirable for learning.
    Geller J; Davis SD; Peterson DJ
    Memory; 2020 Sep; 28(8):957-967. PubMed ID: 32723219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The generation effect and the modeling of associations in memory.
    Clark SE
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):442-55. PubMed ID: 7666757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrieval constraints on associative elaborations.
    Marks W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Apr; 13(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 2952759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applicability of the Compensatory Encoding Model in Foreign Language Reading: An Investigation with Chinese College English Language Learners.
    Han F
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():681. PubMed ID: 28522984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.