These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33415779)

  • 1. Evaluation of Denture Base Adaptation Fabricated Using Conventional, Subtractive, and Additive Technologies: A Volumetric Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis.
    Oğuz Eİ; Kılıçarslan MA; Özcan M; Ocak M; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Mar; 30(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 33415779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptation of Complete Denture Base Fabricated by Conventional, Milling, and 3-D Printing Techniques: An
    Masri G; Mortada R; Ounsi H; Alharbi N; Boulos P; Salameh Z
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Apr; 21(4):367-371. PubMed ID: 32584270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Dimensional Changes Between CAD-CAM Milled Complete Denture Bases and 3D Printed Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Study.
    Helal MA; Abdelrahim RA; Zeidan AAE
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(S1):11-19. PubMed ID: 35524633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of denture base adaptation performance between pour and other conventional fabrication techniques.
    Akaltan F; Batak B; Oguz EI; Orhan K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):183.e1-183.e5. PubMed ID: 31767202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of fabrication techniques on denture base adaptation: An in vitro study.
    Hsu CY; Yang TC; Wang TM; Lin LD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):740-747. PubMed ID: 32448642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of denture base adaptation between additive and conventional fabrication techniques.
    Tosun ON; Bilmenoglu C; Özdemir AK
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):e64-e70. PubMed ID: 36495146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness.
    Kalberer N; Mehl A; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):637-643. PubMed ID: 30711292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques.
    Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Baba NZ; Kattadiyil MT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 27112416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Fit of Dentures Fabricated by Traditional Techniques Versus CAD/CAM Technology.
    McLaughlin JB; Ramos V; Dickinson DP
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):428-435. PubMed ID: 29136309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the effect of thermocycling on the trueness and precision of digitally fabricated complete denture bases.
    Zeidan AAE; Helal MA
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):983. PubMed ID: 39180008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of surface adaptation of complete denture bases fabricated using milling, material jetting, selective laser sintering, digital light processing, and conventional injection molding.
    Schubert O; Edelhoff D; Erdelt KJ; Nold E; Güth JF
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Jul; 25(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 35060369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
    Yoon HI; Hwang HJ; Ohkubo C; Han JS; Park EJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):919-926. PubMed ID: 29961610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of build angle on the tissue surface adaptation of maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing.
    Jin MC; Yoon HI; Yeo IS; Kim SH; Han JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):473-482. PubMed ID: 31227240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Guida L; Zhurakivska K; Troiano G; Chochlidakis K; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 34116839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing: A clinical study.
    Yoon SN; Oh KC; Lee SJ; Han JS; Yoon HI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 31926657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Duplication Techniques on the Fitting Accuracy of CAD-CAM Milled, 3D-Printed, and Injection-Molded Mandibular Complete Denture Bases.
    Emam AM; El-Esawy AA; Alyami MH; Baraka Y; Gad MM; Helal MA
    Dent J (Basel); 2024 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 38392236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fit Accuracy of Complete Denture Base Fabricated by CAD/CAM Milling and 3D-Printing Methods.
    Charoenphol K; Peampring C
    Eur J Dent; 2023 Jul; 17(3):889-894. PubMed ID: 36513334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of digitally fabricated trial dentures.
    Wimmer T; Eichberger M; Lümkemann N; Stawarczyk B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jun; 119(6):942-947. PubMed ID: 28969915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part II - conventional impressions versus digital scans: A clinical controlled crossover study.
    Chebib N; Imamura Y; El Osta N; Srinivasan M; Müller F; Maniewicz S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):618-625. PubMed ID: 36055812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Denture Base Retention and Adaptation Between CAD/CAM and Conventional Fabrication Techniques.
    Faty MA; Sabet ME; Thabet YG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Sep; 36(4):469-478. PubMed ID: 37699188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.