These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33416617)
1. Bioethics as a Vocation. Miller FG Perspect Biol Med; 2020; 63(3):429-443. PubMed ID: 33416617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ethics of peer review in bioethics. Wendler D; Miller F J Med Ethics; 2014 Oct; 40(10):697-701. PubMed ID: 24131903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. It is hard to get there without a guide: How I came to a career in bioethics. Caplan A Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2014 Apr; 23(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 24534738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tips for writing and publishing an article. Nahata MC Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Writing Group Increases Quality Improvement Writing Competency. Balch Samora J; Spencer SP; Valleru J; Bartman T; Brilli RJ; Davis M; Davis JT; McClead R; Crandall W Am J Med Qual; 2020; 35(4):349-354. PubMed ID: 31718231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structuring a written examination to assess ASBH health care ethics consultation core knowledge competencies. White BD; Jankowski JB; Shelton WN Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 24422920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development. Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review and the development of a science. Stichler JF HERD; 2011; 4(3):44-9. PubMed ID: 21866503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review? Allen TW J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2013 Dec; 113(12):916-20. PubMed ID: 24285034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generosity, collegiality, and scientific accuracy when writing and reviewing original research. Desselle SP; Chen AM; Amin M; Aslani P; Dawoud D; Miller MJ; Norgaard LS Res Social Adm Pharm; 2020 Feb; 16(2):261-265. PubMed ID: 31101458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The peer review process: a primer for Hirsch JA; Manchikanti L; Albuquerque FC; Leslie-Mazwi TM; Lev MH; Linfante I; Mocco J; Rai AT; Schaefer PW; Tarr RW J Neurointerv Surg; 2017 Jul; 9(e1):e3-e6. PubMed ID: 25888447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Connecting certification and education. Schonfeld T; Labrecque C; Stoddard H Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 24422921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer-Review and Rejection Causes in Submitting Original Medical Manuscripts. Mendiola Pastrana IR; Hernández AV; Pérez Manjarrez FE; López EO; Romero-Henríquez LF; López-Ortiz G J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2020; 40(3):182-186. PubMed ID: 32427687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fostering revision of argumentative writing through structured peer assessment. Tsai YC; Chuang MT Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Feb; 116(1):210-21. PubMed ID: 23829147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 2014 International Bioethics Forum between UK and China and the professional development of bioethics in China. En-Chang L; Meng L; Jia Z; Ping L Bioethics; 2014 Mar; 28(3):ii-iv. PubMed ID: 24588449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Section Editor's Notebook: Mentoring, Academic Careers, and Manuscript Reviewing. Forman HP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):1. PubMed ID: 27845839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]