These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33416960)

  • 21. Counteracting effects of a non-native prey on the demography of a native predator culminate in positive population growth.
    Cattau CE; Fletcher RJ; Reichert BE; Kitchens WM
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):1952-1968. PubMed ID: 27755742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using genetic techniques to quantify reinvasion, survival and in situ breeding rates during control operations.
    Veale AJ; Edge KA; McMurtrie P; Fewster RM; Clout MN; Gleeson DM
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Oct; 22(20):5071-83. PubMed ID: 24033616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Co-occurring predators increase biotic resistance against an invasive prey.
    Skein L; Alexander ME; Robinson TB
    Mar Environ Res; 2020 May; 157():104929. PubMed ID: 32275511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Individual specialization and generalization in predator-prey dynamics: The determinant role of predation efficiency and prey reproductive rates.
    Araujo G; Moura RR
    J Theor Biol; 2022 Mar; 537():111026. PubMed ID: 35063412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Responses of stoats and least weasels to fluctuating food abundances: is the low phase of the vole cycle due to mustelid predation?
    Korpimäki E; Norrdahl K; Rinta-Jaskari T
    Oecologia; 1991 Dec; 88(4):552-561. PubMed ID: 28312626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Habitat destruction in a simple predator-prey patch model: how predators enhance prey persistence and abundance.
    Prakash S; de Roos AM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2002 Nov; 62(3):231-49. PubMed ID: 12408943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How optimally foraging predators promote prey coexistence in a variable environment.
    Stump SM; Chesson P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2017 Apr; 114():40-58. PubMed ID: 27998797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploiting interspecific olfactory communication to monitor predators.
    Garvey PM; Glen AS; Clout MN; Wyse SV; Nichols M; Pech RP
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Mar; 27(2):389-402. PubMed ID: 27983773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Experimental Test of Preferences for an Invasive Prey by an Endangered Predator: Implications for Conservation.
    Wilcox RC; Fletcher RJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165427. PubMed ID: 27829031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Invasive prey indirectly increase predation on their native competitors.
    Castorani MC; Hovel KA
    Ecology; 2015 Jul; 96(7):1911-22. PubMed ID: 26378313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Herbivore population suppression by an intermediate predator, Phytoseiulus macropilis, is insensitive to the presence of an intraguild predator: an advantage of small body size?
    Rosenheim JA; Limburg DD; Colfer RG; Fournier V; Hsu CL; Leonardo TE; Nelson EH
    Oecologia; 2004 Aug; 140(4):577-85. PubMed ID: 15278424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Density-dependent prey mortality is determined by the spatial scale of predator foraging.
    McCarthy EK; White JW
    Oecologia; 2016 Feb; 180(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 26116266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Functional responses: a question of alternative prey and predator density.
    Tschanz B; Bersier LF; Bacher S
    Ecology; 2007 May; 88(5):1300-8. PubMed ID: 17536415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A native apex predator limits an invasive mesopredator and protects native prey: Tasmanian devils protecting bandicoots from cats.
    Cunningham CX; Johnson CN; Jones ME
    Ecol Lett; 2020 Apr; 23(4):711-721. PubMed ID: 32056330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Understanding contributions of cohort effects to growth rates of fluctuating populations.
    Wittmer HU; Powell RA; King CM
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Sep; 76(5):946-56. PubMed ID: 17714273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Generalist predator, cyclic voles and cavity nests: testing the alternative prey hypothesis.
    Pöysä H; Jalava K; Paasivaara A
    Oecologia; 2016 Dec; 182(4):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 27665542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The roles of predator maturation delay and functional response in determining the periodicity of predator-prey cycles.
    Wang H; Nagy JD; Gilg O; Kuang Y
    Math Biosci; 2009 Sep; 221(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19563815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A functional response model of a predator population foraging in a patchy habitat.
    Nachman G
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Jul; 75(4):948-58. PubMed ID: 17009758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The growth-predation risk trade-off under a growing gape-limited predation threat.
    Urban MC
    Ecology; 2007 Oct; 88(10):2587-97. PubMed ID: 18027761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Indirect effects of prey swamping: differential seed predation during a bamboo masting event.
    Kitzberger T; Chaneton EJ; Caccia F
    Ecology; 2007 Oct; 88(10):2541-54. PubMed ID: 18027757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.