292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33416992)
61. A Strict Patient Selection Protocol Could Be the Key to Success for Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS).
Theodoropoulos GE; Frountzas M; Karathanasis P; Doulami G; Michalopoulou V; Kimpizi D; Schizas D; Zografos GC
South Med J; 2023 Jun; 116(6):490-495. PubMed ID: 37263612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Clinical Experience of a Smart Articulating Digital Device for Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery.
Khan MF; Kearns E; Cahill RA
Dis Colon Rectum; 2023 Dec; 66(12):e1265-e1268. PubMed ID: 37787571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. [Three procedures of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for advanced mid-low rectal tumor].
Shen Z; Ye Y; Atallah S; Xie Q; Jiang K; Wang S
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 18(10):998-1001. PubMed ID: 26499144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Quality of Local Excision for Rectal Neoplasms Using Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Multi-institutional Matched Analysis.
Lee L; Edwards K; Hunter IA; Hartley JE; Atallah SB; Albert MR; Hill J; Monson JR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Sep; 60(9):928-935. PubMed ID: 28796731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Trans-anal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): a comparative case-control matched-pairs analysis.
Stipa F; Tierno SM; Russo G; Burza A
Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):2081-2086. PubMed ID: 33844090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate-term functional results.
Clermonts SHEM; van Loon YT; Schiphorst AHW; Wasowicz DK; Zimmerman DDE
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1677-1685. PubMed ID: 28905101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. [Not Available].
Usenko OY; Тyvonchu OS; Bayura MI
Klin Khir; 2016 Oct; (10):5-8. PubMed ID: 30479103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. eTAMIS: endoscopic visualization for transanal minimally invasive surgery.
McLemore EC; Coker A; Jacobsen G; Talamini MA; Horgan S
Surg Endosc; 2013 May; 27(5):1842-5. PubMed ID: 23179071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. [Initial report of laparoscopic single incision plus one port with simultaneous robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer surgery].
Tan DW; Zhang F; Ye JW; Liu ZY; Ke ZG; Li R; Tong WD; Li F
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 23(6):605-609. PubMed ID: 32521984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Transanal rectal resection: an initial experience of 20 cases.
Buchs NC; Nicholson GA; Yeung T; Mortensen NJ; Cunningham C; Jones OM; Guy R; Hompes R
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Jan; 18(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 26639062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) for Rectal Lesions: A Systematic Review.
Hong KD; Kang S; Urn JW; Lee SI
Hepatogastroenterology; 2015 Jun; 62(140):863-7. PubMed ID: 26902017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: early outcomes in 50 consecutive patients.
Burke JP; Martin-Perez B; Khan A; Nassif G; de Beche-Adams T; Larach SW; Albert MR; Atallah S
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Jun; 18(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 26749148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) using a new disposable device: our initial experience.
Sevá-Pereira G; Trombeta VL; Capochim Romagnolo LG
Tech Coloproctol; 2014 Apr; 18(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 23740029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Local Excision of Benign and Malignant Rectal Neoplasia: Outcomes From 200 Consecutive Cases With Midterm Follow Up.
Lee L; Burke JP; deBeche-Adams T; Nassif G; Martin-Perez B; Monson JRT; Albert MR; Atallah SB
Ann Surg; 2018 May; 267(5):910-916. PubMed ID: 28252517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Robotic TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery in a cadaveric model.
Atallah SB; Albert MR; deBeche-Adams TH; Larach SW
Tech Coloproctol; 2011 Dec; 15(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 21953243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Indications and Outcomes From 32 Consecutive Patients for the Treatment of Rectal Lesions by Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery.
García-Flórez LJ; Otero-Díez JL; Encinas-Muñiz AI; Sánchez-Domínguez L
Surg Innov; 2017 Aug; 24(4):336-342. PubMed ID: 28355962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of early rectal tumor.
Yoshitomi M; Hasegawa S; Takahashi R; Hida K; Kawada K; Sakai Y
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2018 May; 11(2):182-184. PubMed ID: 29869844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
