BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33417126)

  • 1. Biomechanical design prognosis of two extramedullary fixation devices for subtrochanteric femur fracture: a finite element study.
    Nag P; Chanda S
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Feb; 59(2):271-285. PubMed ID: 33417126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Biomechanical effects of three internal fixation modes on femoral subtrochanteric spiral fractures in osteoporotic patients by finite element analysis].
    An Y; Jiang D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 37(6):688-693. PubMed ID: 37331944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative finite element analysis of three implants fixing stable and unstable subtrochanteric femoral fractures: Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA), Proximal Femoral Locking Plate (PFLP), and Reverse Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS).
    Wang J; Ma JX; Lu B; Bai HH; Wang Y; Ma XL
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 106(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 31345739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Influence of Static Load and Sideways Impact Fall on Extramedullary Bone Plates Used to Treat Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture: A Preclinical Strength Assessment.
    Nag P; Borgohain B; Ahmed KA; Phukan P; Kumar N; Borjali A; Varadarajan KM; Chanda S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Dec; 50(12):1923-1940. PubMed ID: 35821164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
    Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation implants for femoral neck fractures: A comparative finite element analysis.
    Zeng W; Liu Y; Hou X
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105714. PubMed ID: 32858283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical analysis of four types of internal fixation in subtrochanteric fracture models.
    Wang J; Ma XL; Ma JX; Xing D; Yang Y; Zhu SW; Ma BY; Chen Y; Feng R; Jia HB; Yu JT
    Orthop Surg; 2014 May; 6(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 24890295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospects of implant with locking plate in fixation of subtrochanteric fracture: experimental demonstration of its potential benefits on synthetic femur model with supportive hierarchical nonlinear hyperelastic finite element analysis.
    Latifi MH; Ganthel K; Rukmanikanthan S; Mansor A; Kamarul T; Bilgen M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2012 Apr; 11():23. PubMed ID: 22545650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical Study of Intramedullary Versus Extramedullary Implants for Four Types of Subtrochanteric Femoral Fracture.
    Wang J; Jia H; Ma X; Ma J; Lu B; Bai H; Wang Y
    Orthop Surg; 2022 Aug; 14(8):1884-1891. PubMed ID: 35706129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femur fractures.
    Tazawa R; Minehara H; Matsuura T; Kawamura T; Sakai R; Yoshida K; Inoue G; Takaso M
    J Orthop Sci; 2021 Mar; 26(2):261-265. PubMed ID: 32245694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of a subtrochanteric fractured femur with dynamic hip screw, dynamic condylar screw, and proximal femur nail implants--a comparative study.
    Sowmianarayanan S; Chandrasekaran A; Kumar RK
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Jan; 222(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 18335723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of proximal locking plates and blade plates for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
    Floyd JC; O'Toole RV; Stall A; Forward DP; Nabili M; Shillingburg D; Hsieh A; Nascone JW
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):628-33. PubMed ID: 19897983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane.
    Özer A; Öner K; Okutan AE; Ayas MS
    Jt Dis Relat Surg; 2022; 33(2):352-358. PubMed ID: 35852194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semi-rigid screws provide an auxiliary option to plate working length to control interfragmentary movement in locking plate fixation at the distal femur.
    Heyland M; Duda GN; Haas NP; Trepczynski A; Döbele S; Höntzsch D; Schaser KD; Märdian S
    Injury; 2015 Oct; 46 Suppl 4():S24-32. PubMed ID: 26542863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A biomechanical study on the laminate stacking sequence in composite bone plates for vancouver femur B1 fracture fixation.
    Dhason R; Roy S; Datta S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105680. PubMed ID: 32763643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical Evaluation of Four Methods for Internal Fixation of Comminuted Subtrochanteric Fractures.
    Wang J; Ma JX; Jia HB; Chen Y; Yang Y; Ma XL
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(19):e3382. PubMed ID: 27175636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A new exploration and consideration of Type A fracture of distal femur based on finite element biomechanical analysis].
    Xu D; Sun RJ; Wang TY; Zhao XQ; Bi ZG; Geng S
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 57(11):812-817. PubMed ID: 31694128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical effect of the configuration of screw hole style on locking plate fixation in proximal humerus fracture with a simulated gap: A finite element analysis.
    Zhang YK; Wei HW; Lin KP; Chen WC; Tsai CL; Lin KJ
    Injury; 2016 Jun; 47(6):1191-5. PubMed ID: 26975793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures. A biomechanical study.
    Kummer FJ; Olsson O; Pearlman CA; Ceder L; Larsson S; Koval KJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1998 Dec; 69(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 9930101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of modified anatomic plates is comparable to proximal femoral nail, dynamic hip screw and anatomic plates: finite element and biomechanical testing.
    Oken OF; Soydan Z; Yildirim AO; Gulcek M; Ozlu K; Ucaner A
    Injury; 2011 Oct; 42(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 21474133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.