76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33417628)
1. The Diagnostic Efficacy of Swede Score for Prediction of Pre-invasive Cervical Lesions: A Prospective Hospital-Based Study.
Rahman Z; Yadav G; Tripathi U
J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2020 Dec; 70(6):497-502. PubMed ID: 33417628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colposcopic analysis of cervical lesions using popular scoring systems: Reid versus Swede.
Safoorah A; Kanagal D; D'Cunha P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Nov; 304(5):1253-1258. PubMed ID: 34432109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the associations of Reid Colposcopic Index and Swede Score with cervical histology.
Suwanthananon C; Inthasorn P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Apr; 46(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 32022421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparison of the Strength of Association of Reid Colposcopic Index and Swede Score With Cervical Histology.
Ranga R; Rai S; Kumari A; Mathur S; Kriplani A; Mahey R; Agarwal N; Kachhawa G; Vanamail P; Bhatla N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Jan; 21(1):55-58. PubMed ID: 27851696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Swede score: evaluation of a scoring system designed to improve the predictive value of colposcopy.
Bowring J; Strander B; Young M; Evans H; Walker P
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 20885156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopic scoring indexes in the evaluation of cervical lesions with the cytological result of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade lesion.
Kudela E; Laucekova Z; Nachajova M; Visnovsky J; Bielik T; Krivus S; Biringer K; Balharek T; Zubor P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Feb; 46(2):314-319. PubMed ID: 31814228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association of Swede Score and 2011 IFCPC Nomenclature in Women with Abnormal Cytology.
Campos PL; Guimarães ICCDV; Fialho SCAV; Martins CAO; Rodrigues FR; Velarde LGC; Monteiro DDSA
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 44(10):938-944. PubMed ID: 36446560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of colposcopic examination in patients with oral dysplastic lesions.
Mahmoud SAM; Latif MKA; Dahmoush HM; Hussein EA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Dec; 130(6):692-699. PubMed ID: 32981873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting.
Nessa A; Roy JS; Chowdhury MA; Khanam Q; Afroz R; Wistrand C; Thuresson M; Thorsell M; Shemer I; Wikström Shemer EA
BMJ Open; 2014 Nov; 4(11):e005313. PubMed ID: 25366674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of Two Colposcopic Indices for Predicting Premalignant Lesions of Cervix.
Kushwah S; Kushwah B
J Midlife Health; 2017; 8(3):118-123. PubMed ID: 28983158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic colposcopic accuracy by the gynocular and a stationary colposcope.
Kallner HK; Persson M; Thuresson M; Altman D; Shemer I; Thorsell M; Shemer EA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 26063001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of colposcopy using Reid colposcopic index with histopathology- a prospective study.
Durdi GS; Sherigar BY; Dalal AM; Desai BR; Malur PR
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2009; 10(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 24591873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Closer to a Uniform Language in Colposcopy: Study on the Potential Application of 2011 International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Terminology in Clinical Practice.
Li Y; Duan X; Sui L; Xu F; Xu S; Zhang H; Xu C
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():8984516. PubMed ID: 28626767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of inter-observer concordance of the Swede score for digital colposcopic images.
Mora-Enríquez JA; Amaya-Guio J; Salamanca-Mora S; Monsalve-Páez S; Granados-Casallas N; Castillo-Zamora MF
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol; 2019 Jun; 70(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 31613074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement of colposcope and gynocular in assessment of cervical lesions by swede score: a randomized, crossover pilot trial.
Ngonzi J; Bajunirwe F; Wistrand C; Mayanja R; Altman D; Thorsell M; Wikström Shemer EA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Oct; 17(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 23645068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of hand-held colposcope (Gynocular) in comparison with standard colposcope in patients with abnormal cervical cytology or visual inspection with acetic acid positivity: a cross over randomized controlled study.
Jayabalan S; Subbaiah M; Chaturvedula L
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2023 Jul; 66(4):300-306. PubMed ID: 37365989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Agreement between colposcopic diagnosis with 2011 international terminology of colposcopy and cervical pathology in cervical lesions].
Li Y; Zhang H; Zheng R; Xie F; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 May; 50(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 26311456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of colposcopic scoring by modified International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy terminology for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a low-resource setting.
Rema PN; Mathew A; Thomas S
South Asian J Cancer; 2019; 8(4):218-220. PubMed ID: 31807480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic value of the 2011 International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Terminology in predicting cervical lesions.
Fan A; Wang C; Zhang L; Yan Y; Han C; Xue F
Oncotarget; 2018 Feb; 9(10):9166-9176. PubMed ID: 29507681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing colposcopic accuracy for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion detection: a retrospective, cohort study.
Bai A; Wang J; Li Q; Seery S; Xue P; Jiang Y
BMC Womens Health; 2022 Jan; 22(1):9. PubMed ID: 35012523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
