BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33417929)

  • 1. Males can't afford to be choosy: Male reproductive investment does not influence preference for female size in Limia (Poeciliidae).
    Spikes M; Schlupp I
    Behav Processes; 2021 Feb; 183():104315. PubMed ID: 33417929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Males Become Choosier in Response to Manipulations of Female Wing Ornaments in Dry Season Bicyclus anynana Butterflies.
    Ng SY; Bhardwaj S; Monteiro A
    J Insect Sci; 2017 Jul; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 28973485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new livebearing fish of the genus Limia (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae) from Lake Miragoane, Haiti.
    Rodriguez-Silva R; Weaver PF
    J Fish Biol; 2020 Jun; 96(6):1360-1369. PubMed ID: 32112652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Male size does not affect the strength of male mate choice for high-quality females in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lev A; Pischedda A
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1255-1265. PubMed ID: 37534751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies.
    Barrett LT; Evans JP; Gasparini C
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93780. PubMed ID: 24705713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behaviour of Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus during an induced mating season in captivity: how male relative size influences male behavioural investment and female preference over time.
    Bolgan M; O'Brien J; Picciulin M; Manning L; Gammell M
    J Fish Biol; 2017 Apr; 90(4):1479-1505. PubMed ID: 28000210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Male genotype influences female reproductive investment in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Pischedda A; Stewart AD; Little MK; Rice WR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Jul; 278(1715):2165-72. PubMed ID: 21159677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deadbeats or losers: Discretionary male parental investment can make females less choosy.
    Meacham F; Getty T
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Jun; 422():50-58. PubMed ID: 28414086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Condition-dependent female preference for male genitalia length is based on male reproductive tactics.
    Hernandez-Jimenez A; Rios-Cardenas O
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Dec; 284(1868):. PubMed ID: 29212729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal variation in size-assortative mating and male mate choice in a spider with amphisexual care.
    Moura RR; Gonzaga MO
    Naturwissenschaften; 2017 Apr; 104(3-4):28. PubMed ID: 28289773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of a parasitic nematode on male mate choice in a livebearing fish with a coercive mating system (western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis).
    Deaton R
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18765273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproductive failure of dominant males in the poeciliid fish Limia perugiae determined by DNA fingerprinting.
    Schartl M; Erbelding-Denk C; Hölter S; Nanda I; Schmid M; Schröder JH; Epplen JT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1993 Aug; 90(15):7064-8. PubMed ID: 8346218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Male size and reproductive performance in three species of livebearing fishes (Gambusia spp.): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kim B; Moran NP; Reinhold K; Sánchez-Tójar A
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Oct; 90(10):2431-2445. PubMed ID: 34231219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female preference for males depends on reproductive physiology in the African cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni.
    Kidd MR; O'Connell LA; Kidd CE; Chen CW; Fontenot MR; Williams SJ; Hofmann HA
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2013 Jan; 180():56-63. PubMed ID: 23168085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation.
    Harris WE; Uller T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2009 Apr; 364(1520):1039-48. PubMed ID: 19324609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of individual state on the strength of mate choice in females and males.
    Dougherty LR
    Behav Ecol; 2023; 34(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 36998999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative life histories of fishes in the subgenus Limia (Pisces: Poeciliidae).
    Cohen SN; Regus JU; Reynoso Y; Mastro T; Reznick DN
    J Fish Biol; 2015 Jul; 87(1):100-14. PubMed ID: 26044076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limia mandibularis, a new livebearing fish (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae) from Lake Miragoane, Haiti.
    Rodriguez-Silva R; Torres-Pineda P; Josaphat J
    Zootaxa; 2020 May; 4768(3):zootaxa.4768.3.6. PubMed ID: 33055650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Male mate choice in livebearing fishes: an overview.
    Schlupp I;
    Curr Zool; 2018 Jun; 64(3):393-403. PubMed ID: 30402080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.