163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3341868)
1. Screening for pseudohypertension. A quantitative, noninvasive approach.
Hla KM; Feussner JR
Arch Intern Med; 1988 Mar; 148(3):673-6. PubMed ID: 3341868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osler's maneuver: absence of usefulness for the detection of pseudohypertension in an elderly population.
Belmin J; Visintin JM; Salvatore R; Sebban C; Moulias R
Am J Med; 1995 Jan; 98(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 7825617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Measurement of arterial pressure using 3 measurement methods in medial arterial calcification].
Thierry FX; Dueymes JM; Vernier I; Barbe P; Berg P; Dumazer P; Lumbroso C; Conte JJ
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1989 Jul; 82(7):1007-11. PubMed ID: 2510622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overestimation of blood pressure in the elderly.
Pitlik SD; Morduchowicz G; Blai A; Rosenfeld JB
Isr J Med Sci; 1986 Jun; 22(6):435-7. PubMed ID: 3759424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of indirect and direct blood pressure measurements with Osler's manoeuvre in elderly hypertensive patients.
Lewis RR; Evans PJ; McNabb WR; Padayachee TS
J Hum Hypertens; 1994 Dec; 8(12):879-85. PubMed ID: 7884785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Arterial hypertension difficult to control in the elderly patient. The significance of the "white coat effect"].
Amado P; Vasconcelos N; Santos I; Almeida L; Nazaré J; Carmona J
Rev Port Cardiol; 1999 Oct; 18(10):897-906. PubMed ID: 10590654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low predictive value of positive Osler manoeuvre for diagnosing pseudohypertension.
Oliner CM; Elliott WJ; Gretler DD; Murphy MB
J Hum Hypertens; 1993 Feb; 7(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8450523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?
Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR
Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of intra-arterial and automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement methods in postoperative hypertensive patients.
Loubser PG
Med Instrum; 1986; 20(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 3784934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of two indirect methods of blood pressure measurement in ill patients.
Rebenson-Piano M; Holm K; Foreman MD; Kirchhoff KT
Nurs Res; 1989; 38(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 2911511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Overestimation of diastolic blood pressure in the elderly. Magnitude of the problem and a potential solution.
Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1985 Oct; 33(10):659-63. PubMed ID: 4045082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Indirect blood pressure monitoring in the postpartum patient.
Kirshon B; Lee W; Cotton DB; Giebel R
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):799-801. PubMed ID: 3309754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Level of blood pressure control in a hypertensive population when measurements are performed outside the clinical setting.
Félix-Redondo FJ; Fernández-Bergés D; Espinosa-Garcia J; Pozuelos-Estrada J; Molina-Martínez LM; Pérez-Castán JF; Ríos-Rivera J; Valiente-Rubio JI; Gómez-de-la-Cámara A; Rodríguez-Pascual N
Cardiol J; 2009; 16(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 19130417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence of home blood pressure measurement among selected hypertensive patients: results of a multicenter survey from six hospital outpatient hypertension clinics in Italy.
Cuspidi C; Meani S; Lonati L; Fusi V; Magnaghi G; Garavelli G; Palumbo G; Pini C; Vaccarella A; Parati G; Leonetti G; Zanchetti A;
Blood Press; 2005; 14(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 16126560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Assessment of auscultatory blood pressure measurements versus intra-arterial pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation].
Ochiai H; Mitake A; Miyata T; Ishigami T; Ashino K; Sumita S; Miyazaki N; Ishii M
J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 29(6):331-6. PubMed ID: 9211092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between continuous ambulatory arterial blood pressure monitoring and standard blood pressure measurements among patients of younger and older age group.
Babić BK; Bagatin J; Kokić S; Ostojić SB; Carević V; Berović N
Coll Antropol; 2009 Mar; 33(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 19408605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-measured home blood pressure in predicting ambulatory hypertension.
Mansoor GA; White WB
Am J Hypertens; 2004 Nov; 17(11 Pt 1):1017-22. PubMed ID: 15533727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
