114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33419655)
1. Mechanical standardisation of mammographic compression using Volpara software.
Serwan E; Matthews D; Davies J; Chau M
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):789-794. PubMed ID: 33419655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic compression--a need for mechanical standardization.
Branderhorst W; de Groot JE; Highnam R; Chan A; Böhm-Vélez M; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 25596915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081901. PubMed ID: 23927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is Individualizing Breast Compression during Mammography useful? - Investigations of pain indications during mammography relating to compression force and surface area of the compressed breast.
Feder K; Grunert JH
Rofo; 2017 Jan; 189(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 28002858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic compression in Asian women.
Lau S; Abdul Aziz YF; Ng KH
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175781. PubMed ID: 28419125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of pressure-controlled mammography compression paddles with respect to force-controlled compression paddles in clinical practice.
Jeukens CRLPN; van Dijk T; Berben C; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MBI
Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2545-2552. PubMed ID: 30617472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic compression practices of force- and pressure-standardisation protocol: A scoping review.
Serwan E; Matthews D; Davies J; Chau M
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 67(3):233-242. PubMed ID: 32420700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical Note: Validation of two methods to determine contact area between breast and compression paddle in mammography.
Branderhorst W; de Groot JE; van Lier MGJTB; Highnam RP; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4040-4044. PubMed ID: 28569996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To what extent are objectively measured mammographic imaging techniques associated with compression outcomes.
Hudson SM; Wilkinson LS; De Stavola BL; Dos-Santos-Silva I
Br J Radiol; 2023 Jun; 96(1146):20230089. PubMed ID: 37086069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards personalized compression in mammography: a comparison study between pressure- and force-standardization.
de Groot JE; Branderhorst W; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJM
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 25554008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographic compression after breast conserving therapy: controlling pressure instead of force.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):023501. PubMed ID: 24506652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical validation of a pressure-standardized compression mammography system.
den Boer D; Dam-Vervloet LAJ; Boomsma MF; de Boer E; van Dalen JA; Poot L
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():251-254. PubMed ID: 30017290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast compression and reported pain during mammographic screening.
Moshina N; Sagstad S; Sebuødegård S; Waade GG; Gran E; Music J; Hofvind S
Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):133-139. PubMed ID: 32052779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Compression force variability in mammography in Ghana - A baseline study.
Dzidzornu E; Angmorterh SK; Ofori-Manteaw BB; Aboagye S; Ofori EK; Owusu-Agyei S; Hogg P
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):150-155. PubMed ID: 32741566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pressure-standardised mammography does not affect visibility, contrast and sharpness of stable lesions.
de Groot JE; Hopman IGM; van Lier MGJTB; Branderhorst W; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():289-295. PubMed ID: 28027762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based mammography screening.
Holland K; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM; den Heeten GJ; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Nov; 19(1):126. PubMed ID: 29183348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ
BMC Womens Health; 2015; 15():26. PubMed ID: 25783657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pressures in a simulated breast subjected to compression forces comparable to those of mammography. Work in Progress.
Russell DG; Ziewacz JT
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):383-7. PubMed ID: 7824714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast compression and experienced pain during mammography by use of three different compression paddles.
Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Evensen KT; Hantho C; Iden KA; Hofvind S
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():59-65. PubMed ID: 31084760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography.
Balleyguier C; Cousin M; Dunant A; Attard M; Delaloge S; Arfi-Rouche J
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 103():137-142. PubMed ID: 30223227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
