These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in multiple calyceal stones: A match pair analysis of 190 cases. Baran O; Aykac A Arch Esp Urol; 2021 Mar; 74(2):247-253. PubMed ID: 33650540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Intrarenal Surgery vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Lower Pole Stones Greater than 2 cm. Koyuncu H; Yencilek F; Kalkan M; Bastug Y; Yencilek E; Ozdemir AT Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 26005965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. External validation of the R.I.R.S. scoring system to predict stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery. Wang C; Wang S; Wang X; Lu J BMC Urol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 33663459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of lower pole renal stones. Grisard S; Franquet Q; Garnier-Crussard A; Poncet D; Overs C; Matillon X; Long JA; Descotes JL; Badet L; Abid N; Fiard G Prog Urol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 34332831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for stones larger than 2 cm in patients with a solitary kidney: a matched-pair analysis. Zeng G; Zhu W; Li J; Zhao Z; Zeng T; Liu C; Liu Y; Yuan J; Wan SP World J Urol; 2015 Aug; 33(8):1159-64. PubMed ID: 25331936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Nomogram to predict the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with residual stones following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Xie F; Deng S; Fei K; Xu H; Zhang H Int Braz J Urol; 2023; 49(5):599-607. PubMed ID: 37390125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus JJ ureteric stent as the initial drainage method in kidney stone patients presenting with acute kidney injury: A prospective randomized study. Elbatanouny AM; Ragheb AM; Abdelbary AM; Fathy H; Massoud AM; Abd El Latif A; Moussa AS; Ibrahim RM Int J Urol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):916-921. PubMed ID: 32851713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stone in solitary kidney patients. Lai D; Chen M; He Y; Li X; Wan S Ren Fail; 2018 Nov; 40(1):390-394. PubMed ID: 30040518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Predictive factors for flexible ureterorenoscopy requirement after rigid ureterorenoscopy in cases with renal pelvic stones sized 1 to 2 cm. Süer E; Gülpinar Ö; Özcan C; Göğüş Ç; Kerimov S; Şafak M Korean J Urol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 25685301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Pelvic Stones of 2-3 cm. Erkoc M; Bozkurt M J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Jun; 31(6):605-609. PubMed ID: 33316204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Update on Urinary Stones in Children: Current and Future Concepts in Surgical Treatment and Shockwave Lithotripsy. Silay MS; Ellison JS; Tailly T; Caione P Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Apr; 3(2-3):164-171. PubMed ID: 28802643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The Predictive Role of Abdominal Fat Parameters and Stone Density on SWL Outcomes. Kaya C; Kaynak Y; Karabag A; Aykaç A Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2020; 16(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 31989897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Shockwave Lithotripsy Is an Efficacious Treatment Modality for Obese Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi: Logistic Regression and Matched-Pair Analyses from a Dedicated Center Comparing Treatment Outcomes by Skin-to-Stone Distance. Mains EAA; Blackmur JP; Sharma AD; Gietzmann WK; El-Mokadem I; Stephenson C; Wallace S; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Tolley DA; Cutress ML J Endourol; 2020 Apr; 34(4):487-494. PubMed ID: 32030994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Does Previous Open Renal Stone Surgery Affect the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Treatment in Adults with Renal Stones? Gültekin MH; Türegün FA; Ozkan B; Tülü B; Güleç GG; Tansu N; Demirdağ Ç; Kendigelen P; Erözenci A; Önal B J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1295-1300. PubMed ID: 28891311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Factors to predict shock-wave lithotripsy results in pediatric patients and external validation of a nomogram. Cetin S; Yavuz Koparal M; Cem Bulut E; Serhat Gurocak O; Ozgur Tan M Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2021 Mar; 45(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 33162206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Reinforcement of the Triple D score with simple addition of the intrarenal location for the prediction of the stone-free rate after shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones 10-20 mm in diameter. Ichiyanagi O; Fukuhara H; Kurokawa M; Izumi T; Suzuki H; Naito S; Nishida H; Kato T; Tsuchiya N Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Feb; 51(2):239-245. PubMed ID: 30604235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Which Should be Preferred for Moderate-Size Kidney Stones? Ultramini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery? Demirbas A; Resorlu B; Sunay MM; Karakan T; Karagöz MA; Doluoglu OG J Endourol; 2016 Dec; 30(12):1285-1289. PubMed ID: 27706948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]