168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33419850)
1. Similar Recurrence Rate Between Gleason Score of Six at Positive Margin and Negative Margin After Radical Prostatectomy.
Kano H; Kadono Y; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Kawaguchi S; Nohara T; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Ikeda H; Mizokami A
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jan; 41(1):509-516. PubMed ID: 33419850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positive surgical margin in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: correlation with pathology findings and risk of biochemical recurrence.
Jo JK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Zargar H; Autorino R; Lee SE
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Oct; 69(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 28376606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I
Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Warner JN; Nunez RN; Mmeje CO; Colby TV; Ferrigni RG; Humphreys MR; Andrews PE; Castle EP
Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.
Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of positive surgical margin status in predicting early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Morizane S; Yumioka T; Makishima K; Tsounapi P; Iwamoto H; Hikita K; Honda M; Umekita Y; Takenaka A
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Oct; 26(10):1961-1967. PubMed ID: 34313905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins.
Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK
Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Association Between Gleason Score at a Positive Surgical Margin and the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
Iremashvili V; Pelaez L; Jorda M; Parekh DJ; Punnen S
Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 Mar; 43(3):369-373. PubMed ID: 30557174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wrong to be Right: Margin Laterality is an Independent Predictor of Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy.
Kang JJ; Reiter RE; Kummer N; DeKernion J; Steinberg ML; King CR
Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26237192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.
Shapiro EY; Scarberry K; Patel T; Bergman A; Ahn JJ; Sahi N; RoyChoudhury A; Deutch I; McKiernan JM; Benson MC; Badani KK
J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
