These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33422723)

  • 21. Mesh morphing and response surface analysis: quantifying sensitivity of vertebral mechanical behavior.
    Sigal IA; Whyne CM
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Jan; 38(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 19859809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An eFTD-VP framework for efficiently generating patient-specific anatomically detailed facial soft tissue FE mesh for craniomaxillofacial surgery simulation.
    Zhang X; Kim D; Shen S; Yuan P; Liu S; Tang Z; Zhang G; Zhou X; Gateno J; Liebschner MAK; Xia JJ
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Apr; 17(2):387-402. PubMed ID: 29027022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Geometric modeling of living tissue for subject-specific finite element analysis.
    Tada M; Yoshida H; Mochimaru M
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; Suppl():6639-42. PubMed ID: 17959473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Morphing methods to parameterize specimen-specific finite element model geometries.
    Sigal IA; Yang H; Roberts MD; Downs JC
    J Biomech; 2010 Jan; 43(2):254-62. PubMed ID: 19878950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of sitting posture on pelvic injury risk under vertical loading.
    Tse KM; Lee Robinson D; Franklyn M; Zhang JY; Spratley EM; Salzar RS; Fernandez J; Ackland DC; Lee PVS
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Aug; 108():103780. PubMed ID: 32310106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pelvic Inlet Shape Is Not as Dimorphic as Previously Suggested.
    Delprete H
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2017 Apr; 300(4):706-715. PubMed ID: 28297189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development and validation of patient-specific finite element models of the hemipelvis generated from a sparse CT data set.
    Shim VB; Pitto RP; Streicher RM; Hunter PJ; Anderson IA
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051010. PubMed ID: 19045517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistical shape and appearance models for fast and automated estimation of proximal femur fracture load using 2D finite element models.
    Sarkalkan N; Waarsing JH; Bos PK; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA
    J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):3107-14. PubMed ID: 25052137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of a Patient-Specific Finite Element Model for Predicting Implant Failure in Pelvic Ring Fracture Fixation.
    Shim V; Gather A; Höch A; Schreiber D; Grunert R; Peldschus S; Josten C; Böhme J
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():9403821. PubMed ID: 28255332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cardiac mesh morphing method for finite element modeling of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
    Weissmann J; Charles CJ; Richards AM; Yap CH; Marom G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():104937. PubMed ID: 34979481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mesh morphing for finite element analysis of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements.
    Bah MT; Nair PB; Browne M
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1235-43. PubMed ID: 19744873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Finite element analysis and static biomechanics of pelvic after modular hemipelvic prosthesis reconstruction].
    Feng P; Lian SH; Duan H; Min L; Zhou Y; Liu Z; Tu CQ
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Mar; 43(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 22650032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The finite element modeling of human pelvis and its application in medicolegal expertise].
    Li ZD; Zou DH; Liu NG; Huang P; Chen YJ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 26(6):406-12. PubMed ID: 21425599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro bone strain distributions in a sample of primate pelves.
    Lewton KL
    J Anat; 2015 May; 226(5):458-77. PubMed ID: 25846322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Experimental validation of finite element models of intact and implanted composite hemipelvises using digital image correlation.
    Ghosh R; Gupta S; Dickinson A; Browne M
    J Biomech Eng; 2012 Aug; 134(8):081003. PubMed ID: 22938356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Influence of Pelvic Ramus Fracture on the Stability of Fixed Pelvic Complex Fracture.
    Lei J; Zhang Y; Wu G; Wang Z; Cai X
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():790575. PubMed ID: 26495033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of bone density alterations on strain patterns in the pelvis: application of a finite element model.
    Leung AS; Gordon LM; Skrinskas T; Szwedowski T; Whyne CM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Nov; 223(8):965-79. PubMed ID: 20092094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of the structural behavior of the pelvis during lateral impact using the finite element method.
    Dawson JM; Khmelniker BV; McAndrew MP
    Accid Anal Prev; 1999; 31(1-2):109-19. PubMed ID: 10084625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of boundary constraints on finite element modelling of the human pelvis.
    Watson PJ; Dostanpor A; Fagan MJ; Dobson CA
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 May; 43():48-57. PubMed ID: 28259612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitivity to model geometry in finite element analyses of reconstructed skeletal structures: experience with a juvenile pelvis.
    Watson PJ; Fagan MJ; Dobson CA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Jan; 229(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 25542612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.