These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Gene frequency distributions reject a neutral model of genome evolution. Lobkovsky AE; Wolf YI; Koonin EV Genome Biol Evol; 2013; 5(1):233-42. PubMed ID: 23315380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconstruction of the last bacterial common ancestor from 183 pangenomes reveals a versatile ancient core genome. Hyun JC; Palsson BO Genome Biol; 2023 Aug; 24(1):183. PubMed ID: 37553643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contingency, repeatability, and predictability in the evolution of a prokaryotic pangenome. Beavan AJS; Domingo-Sananes MR; McInerney JO Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Jan; 121(1):e2304934120. PubMed ID: 38147560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pangenomics Comes of Age: From Bacteria to Plant and Animal Applications. Golicz AA; Bayer PE; Bhalla PL; Batley J; Edwards D Trends Genet; 2020 Feb; 36(2):132-145. PubMed ID: 31882191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pangenomes at the limits of evolution. Wolfe JM Trends Ecol Evol; 2024 May; 39(5):419-420. PubMed ID: 38580497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bacterial lifestyle shapes pangenomes. Dewar AE; Hao C; Belcher LJ; Ghoul M; West SA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(21):e2320170121. PubMed ID: 38743630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Core genes can have higher recombination rates than accessory genes within global microbial populations. Preska Steinberg A; Lin M; Kussell E Elife; 2022 Jul; 11():. PubMed ID: 35801696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transporter Proteins as Ecological Assets and Features of Microbial Eukaryotic Pangenomes. Milner DS; Galindo LJ; Irwin NAT; Richards TA Annu Rev Microbiol; 2023 Sep; 77():45-66. PubMed ID: 36944262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental stress leads to genome streamlining in a widely distributed species of soil bacteria. Simonsen AK ISME J; 2022 Feb; 16(2):423-434. PubMed ID: 34408268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors driving effective population size and pan-genome evolution in bacteria. Bobay LM; Ochman H BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):153. PubMed ID: 30314447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of selection pressure exerted on genes from complete pangenomes helps to improve the accuracy in the prediction of new genes. Rubio A; Jimenez J; Pérez-Pulido AJ Brief Bioinform; 2022 Mar; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 35108356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A graph-based approach for the visualisation and analysis of bacterial pangenomes. Harling-Lee JD; Gorzynski J; Yebra G; Angus T; Fitzgerald JR; Freeman TC BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 23(1):416. PubMed ID: 36209064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Weighing the evidence for adaptation at the molecular level. Fay JC Trends Genet; 2011 Sep; 27(9):343-9. PubMed ID: 21775012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomes in turmoil: quantification of genome dynamics in prokaryote supergenomes. Puigbò P; Lobkovsky AE; Kristensen DM; Wolf YI; Koonin EV BMC Biol; 2014 Aug; 12():66. PubMed ID: 25141959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pseudogenes act as a neutral reference for detecting selection in prokaryotic pangenomes. Douglas GM; Shapiro BJ Nat Ecol Evol; 2024 Feb; 8(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 38177690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]