These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33424708)

  • 41. Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups.
    Noel JG; Wann DL; Branscombe NR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1995 Jan; 68(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 7861310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Becoming Team Members: Identifying Interaction Patterns of Mutual Adaptation for Human-Robot Co-Learning.
    van Zoelen EM; van den Bosch K; Neerincx M
    Front Robot AI; 2021; 8():692811. PubMed ID: 34295926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A double standard when group members behave badly: transgression credit to ingroup leaders.
    Abrams D; Randsley de Moura G; Travaglino GA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):799-815. PubMed ID: 23895265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations.
    Wang Y; Zhang Z; Bai L; Lin C; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():39827. PubMed ID: 28051156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Exploring the Effects of a Social Robot's Speech Entrainment and Backstory on Young Children's Emotion, Rapport, Relationship, and Learning.
    Kory-Westlund JM; Breazeal C
    Front Robot AI; 2019; 6():54. PubMed ID: 33501069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Corralling the ingroup: deviant derogation and perception of group variability.
    Hutchison P; Abrams D; De Moura GR
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(3):334-50. PubMed ID: 23724703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of mortality salience on evaluation of ingroup and outgroup sources: the impact of pro- versus counterattitudinal positions.
    See YH; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Mar; 32(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 16455866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Imagine how to behave: the influence of imagined contact on human-robot interaction.
    Wullenkord R; Eyssel F
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Apr; 374(1771):20180038. PubMed ID: 30853004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.
    Balliet D; Wu J; De Dreu CK
    Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 140(6):1556-81. PubMed ID: 25222635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: development of the black sheep effect.
    Abrams D; Palmer SB; Rutland A; Cameron L; Van de Vyver J
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Jan; 50(1):258-70. PubMed ID: 23544855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Effects of subliminal mere exposure to group members on intergroup evaluation: category evaluation measured in the Implicit Association Test (IAT)].
    Kawakami N; Yoshida F
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2010 Oct; 81(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 21061506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Children's reliance on the non-verbal cues of a robot versus a human.
    Verhagen J; Berghe RVD; Oudgenoeg-Paz O; Küntay A; Leseman P
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0217833. PubMed ID: 31856239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Trust Dynamics and Verbal Assurances in Human Robot Physical Collaboration.
    Alhaji B; Prilla M; Rausch A
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():703504. PubMed ID: 34355165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The mere presence of an outgroup member disrupts the brain's feedback-monitoring system.
    Hobson NM; Inzlicht M
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 11(11):1698-1706. PubMed ID: 27330183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The impact of helping behavior on outgroup infrahumanization.
    Delgado N; Betancor V; Rodríguez-Pérez A; Ariño E
    Span J Psychol; 2012 Nov; 15(3):1099-109. PubMed ID: 23156918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The loyal member effect: on the preference for ingroup members who engage in exclusive relations with the ingroup.
    Castelli L; De Amicis L; Sherman SJ
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Nov; 43(6):1347-1359. PubMed ID: 18020816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Social Threat and Motor Resonance: When a Menacing Outgroup Delays Motor Response.
    Capellini R; Sacchi S; Ricciardelli P; Actis-Grosso R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1697. PubMed ID: 27847491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. We're warmer (they're more competent): I-sharing and African Americans' perceptions of the ingroup and outgroup.
    Pinel EC; Long AE; Crimin LA
    Eur J Soc Psychol; 2008 Nov; 38(7):1184-1192. PubMed ID: 19911033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of Religious Priming Concepts on Prosocial Behavior Towards Ingroup and Outgroup.
    Batara JB; Franco PS; Quiachon MA; Sembrero DR
    Eur J Psychol; 2016 Nov; 12(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 27872671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The development of ingroup favoritism in repeated social dilemmas.
    Dorrough AR; Glöckner A; Hellmann DM; Ebert I
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():476. PubMed ID: 25972821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.