162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33424914)
1. Applying the Metafounders Approach for Genomic Evaluation in a Multibreed Beef Cattle Population.
Junqueira VS; Lopes PS; Lourenco D; Silva FFE; Cardoso FF
Front Genet; 2020; 11():556399. PubMed ID: 33424914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metafounders May Reduce Bias in Composite Cattle Genomic Predictions.
Kluska S; Masuda Y; Ferraz JBS; Tsuruta S; Eler JP; Baldi F; Lourenco D
Front Genet; 2021; 12():678587. PubMed ID: 34490031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):923-939. PubMed ID: 34799109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metafounders are related to F
Garcia-Baccino CA; Legarra A; Christensen OF; Misztal I; Pocrnic I; Vitezica ZG; Cantet RJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):34. PubMed ID: 28283016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliabilities of estimated breeding values in models with metafounders.
Bermann M; Aguilar I; Lourenco D; Misztal I; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jan; 55(1):6. PubMed ID: 36690938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups.
Macedo FL; Christensen OF; Astruc JM; Aguilar I; Masuda Y; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Aug; 52(1):47. PubMed ID: 32787772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling missing pedigree in single-step genomic BLUP.
Bradford HL; Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Legarra A; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2336-2346. PubMed ID: 30638995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders.
Kudinov AA; Koivula M; Aamand GP; Strandén I; Mäntysaari EA
Front Genet; 2022; 13():1012205. PubMed ID: 36479243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metafounder approach for single-step genomic evaluations of Red Dairy cattle.
Kudinov AA; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Uimari P; Strandén I
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6299-6310. PubMed ID: 32418688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technical note: Genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in a single-step approach with metafounders.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Legarra A
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1472-1480. PubMed ID: 28464109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Removing data and using metafounders alleviates biases for all traits in Lacaune dairy sheep predictions.
Macedo FL; Astruc JM; Meuwissen THE; Legarra A
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Mar; 105(3):2439-2452. PubMed ID: 35033343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-step genomic evaluation with metafounders for feed conversion ratio and average daily gain in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.
Fu C; Ostersen T; Christensen OF; Xiang T
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Oct; 53(1):79. PubMed ID: 34620083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ancestral Relationships Using Metafounders: Finite Ancestral Populations and Across Population Relationships.
Legarra A; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Aguilar I; Misztal I
Genetics; 2015 Jun; 200(2):455-68. PubMed ID: 25873631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling missing pedigree with metafounders and validating single-step genomic predictions in a small dairy cattle population with a great influence of foreign genetics.
López-Correa RD; Legarra A; Aguilar I
J Dairy Sci; 2024 Jul; 107(7):4685-4692. PubMed ID: 38310956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic prediction using different estimation methodology, blending and cross-validation techniques for growth traits and visual scores in Hereford and Braford cattle.
Campos GS; Reimann FA; Cardoso LL; Ferreira CER; Junqueira VS; Schmidt PI; Braccini Neto J; Yokoo MJI; Sollero BP; Boligon AA; Cardoso FF
J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(7):2579-2595. PubMed ID: 29741705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data.
Tonussi RL; Silva RMO; Magalhães AFB; Espigolan R; Peripolli E; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Chiaia HLJ; Pereira ASC; Lôbo RB; Bezerra LAF; Magnabosco CU; Lourenço DAL; Aguilar I; Baldi F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0181752. PubMed ID: 28957330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
