164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33424914)
21. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Exploring unknown parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP: Insights from a simulated cattle population.
Himmelbauer J; Schwarzenbacher H; Fuerst C; Fuerst-Waltl B
J Dairy Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38908687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Weighted single-step genomic BLUP improves accuracy of genomic breeding values for protein content in French dairy goats: a quantitative trait influenced by a major gene.
Teissier M; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jun; 50(1):31. PubMed ID: 29907084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Unknown parent groups and truncated pedigree in single-step genomic evaluations of Murrah buffaloes.
Melo TP; Zwirtes AK; Silva AA; Lázaro SF; Oliveira HR; Silveira KR; Santos JCG; Andrade WBF; Kluska S; Evangelho LA; Oliveira HN; Tonhati H
J Dairy Sci; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38825116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bias in estimates of variance components in populations undergoing genomic selection: a simulation study.
Gao H; Madsen P; Aamand GP; Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC; Jensen J
BMC Genomics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):956. PubMed ID: 31818251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Genomic prediction for tick resistance in Braford and Hereford cattle.
Cardoso FF; Gomes CC; Sollero BP; Oliveira MM; Roso VM; Piccoli ML; Higa RH; Yokoo MJ; Caetano AR; Aguilar I
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2693-705. PubMed ID: 26115257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Genomic prediction for crossbred performance using metafounders.
van Grevenhof EM; Vandenplas J; Calus MPL
J Anim Sci; 2019 Feb; 97(2):548-558. PubMed ID: 30423111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of molecular markers to improve relationship information in the genetic evaluation of beef cattle tick resistance under pedigree-based models.
Junqueira VS; Cardoso FF; Oliveira MM; Sollero BP; Silva FF; Lopes PS
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Feb; 134(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 27658502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals.
Jibrila I; Ten Napel J; Vandenplas J; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jul; 52(1):42. PubMed ID: 32727349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison on genomic prediction using pedigree BLUP and single step GBLUP through the Hanwoo full-sib family.
Kim EH; Kang HC; Myung CH; Kim JY; Sun DW; Lee DH; Lee SH; Lim HT
Anim Biosci; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1327-1335. PubMed ID: 37170517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Genomic selection through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction improves the accuracy of evaluation in Hanwoo cattle.
Park MN; Alam M; Kim S; Park B; Lee SH; Lee SS
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2020 Oct; 33(10):1544-1557. PubMed ID: 32054201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Genomic and pedigree estimation of inbreeding depression for semen traits in the Basco-Béarnaise dairy sheep breed.
Antonios S; Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Aguilar I; Astruc JM; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Mar; 104(3):3221-3230. PubMed ID: 33358787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
