These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3342556)

  • 1. Improving the fit of press-fit hip stems.
    Robertson DD; Walker PS; Hirano SK; Zhou XM; Granholm JW; Poss R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Mar; (228):134-40. PubMed ID: 3342556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT-based accuracy of implanting custom-made endoprostheses.
    Götze C; Vieth V; Meier N; Böttner F; Steinbeck J; Hackenberg L
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):856-62. PubMed ID: 16023274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strains and micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses.
    Walker PS; Schneeweis D; Murphy S; Nelson P
    J Biomech; 1987; 20(7):693-702. PubMed ID: 3654667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of press-fit femoral stems on strains in the femur. A photoelastic coating study.
    Zhou XM; Walker PS; Robertson DD
    J Arthroplasty; 1990 Mar; 5(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 2319252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical outcome and quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. A prospective study.
    Pitto RP; Schramm M; Hohmann D; Schmidt R
    Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 12025051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design and fabrication of cementless hip stems.
    Walker PS; Robertson DD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):25-34. PubMed ID: 3416530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonlinear three-dimensional finite element analysis of newly designed cementless total hip stems.
    Ando M; Imura S; Omori H; Okumura Y; Bo A; Baba H
    Artif Organs; 1999 Apr; 23(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 10226698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of cortical strain after cemented and press-fit proximal and distal femoral replacement.
    Hua J; Walker PS
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Sep; 10(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 1500986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two- to four-year experience with cemented, press-fit, and porous coated applications of the profile total hip system.
    Henry JD; Reilly D; Poss R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():190-4. PubMed ID: 8116397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparative periprosthetic bone density measurements of the proximal femur shaft using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with experimental "Press Fit-gliding Stem Prosthesis"].
    Krüger A; Berli B; Lampert C; Kränzlin C; Morscher E
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 9615973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Use of the anatomical cemented femoral stem SAS I: mid-term results].
    Mikláš M; Pink M; Valoušek T
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2015; 82(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 26317186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micromotion, fit, and fill of custom made femoral stems designed with an automated process.
    Dujardin FH; Mollard R; Toupin JM; Coblentz A; Thomine JM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Apr; (325):276-89. PubMed ID: 8998888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
    Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):27-38. PubMed ID: 2245558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Femoral anatomy, computed tomography and computer-aided design of prosthetic implants.
    Adam F; Hammer DS; Pape D; Kohn D
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Jun; 122(5):262-8. PubMed ID: 12070644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cortical bone viscoelasticity and fixation strength of press-fit femoral stems: an in-vitro model.
    Norman TL; Ackerman ES; Smith TS; Gruen TA; Yates AJ; Blaha JD; Kish VL
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Feb; 128(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 16532612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design of custom hip stem prostheses using three-dimensional CT modeling.
    Robertson DD; Walker PS; Granholm JW; Nelson PC; Weiss PJ; Fishman EK; Magid D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1987; 11(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 3655042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the stability of press-fit hip prosthesis femoral stems using a synthetic model femur.
    McKellop H; Ebramzadeh E; Niederer PG; Sarmiento A
    J Orthop Res; 1991 Mar; 9(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 1992078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
    Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
    Behairy YM; Harris WH
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.