129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33425624)
1. Cohesive Round Implants and the Risk of Implant Flipping.
Jong J; Gabriel A; Trekell M; Lawser AS; Heidel E; Buchanan D; Chun JT
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Dec; 8(12):e3321. PubMed ID: 33425624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Critical Analysis of Factors Associated With Anteroposterior Implant Flipping in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Leibl KE; Hwang LK; Anderson C; Weichman KE
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jun; 90(6S Suppl 5):S509-S514. PubMed ID: 36975133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant Malposition in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Experience with Natrelle® Cohesive Implants over 6.5 Years.
Kuruoglu D; Harless CA; Tran NV; Yan M; Martinez-Jorge J; Nguyen MT
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2561-2568. PubMed ID: 35370117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Karp NS; Salibian AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Fenestrated Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Novel Design.
Paydar KZ; Wirth GA; Mowlds DS
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Apr; 6(4):e1712. PubMed ID: 29876165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
Woo J; Seung IH; Hong SE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Nov; 73(11):2016-2024. PubMed ID: 32921621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of pre- or subpectoral expander position with the fenestrated Acellular dermal matrix anterior coverage, on drainage volume and Seroma Formation after Non-Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Suh YC; Kim JK; Kim NR; Choi JS; Kim YJ; Lee JH; Jun YJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Sep; 74(9):2237-2243. PubMed ID: 33618944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with complete ADM or synthetic mesh coverage - 36-Months follow-up in 200 reconstructed breasts.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F; Klaassen-Federspiel F; Sir A
Breast; 2019 Dec; 48():32-37. PubMed ID: 31491673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete implant coverage using double-crossed acellular dermal matrixs.
Lee JS; Kim JS; Lee JH; Lee JW; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD
Gland Surg; 2019 Dec; 8(6):748-757. PubMed ID: 32042683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant Delivery Technique for Prepectoral Reconstruction after Endoscopic-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy.
Yang HJ; Ko G; Kim JH; Lee J; Oh SH
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2021 Jun; 9(6):e3623. PubMed ID: 34123688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing Outcomes in 2-Stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Utilizing Round Form-Stable Implants.
Sbitany H; Lee KR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):43S-50S. PubMed ID: 31246760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Mirhaidari SJ; Azouz V; Wagner DS
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Mar; 84(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31663934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Yang JY; Kim CW; Lee JW; Kim SK; Lee SA; Hwang E
Arch Plast Surg; 2019 Nov; 46(6):550-557. PubMed ID: 31775208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes Utilizing Inspira Implants in Revisionary Reconstructive Surgery.
Sigalove S; Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):66S-72S. PubMed ID: 31246763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast Reconstruction Actualized in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-implant, Prepectoral Polyurethane Positioning: Early Experience and Preliminary Results.
de Vita R; Buccheri EM; Villanucci A; Pozzi M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(2):e358-e363. PubMed ID: 30691930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted breast reconstruction using the prepectoral anterior tenting method.
Jeon DN; Kim J; Ko BS; Lee SB; Kim EK; Eom JS; Han HH
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Nov; 74(11):2906-2915. PubMed ID: 34023241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
