These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3342793)
21. Comparison of asynchronous versus synchronous arm crank ergometry. Mossberg K; Willman C; Topor MA; Crook H; Patak S Spinal Cord; 1999 Aug; 37(8):569-74. PubMed ID: 10455533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Arm crank vs handrim wheelchair propulsion: metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses. Smith PA; Glaser RM; Petrofsky JS; Underwood PD; Smith GB; Richard JJ Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):249-54. PubMed ID: 6860094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of age and gender on cardiac output-VO2 relationships during submaximal cycle ergometry. Proctor DN; Beck KC; Shen PH; Eickhoff TJ; Halliwill JR; Joyner MJ J Appl Physiol (1985); 1998 Feb; 84(2):599-605. PubMed ID: 9475871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effects of cadence and power output upon physiological and biomechanical responses to incremental arm-crank ergometry. Price MJ; Collins L; Smith PM; Goss-Sampson M Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2007 Aug; 32(4):686-92. PubMed ID: 17622283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Metabolic and heart rate responses to submaximal arm lever and arm crank ergometry. Gangelhoff J; Cordain L; Tucker A; Sockler J Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Feb; 69(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 3341886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Submaximal arm crank ergometry: Effects of crank axis positioning on mechanical efficiency, physiological strain and perceived discomfort. van Drongelen S; Maas JC; Scheel-Sailer A; Van Der Woude LH J Med Eng Technol; 2009; 33(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 19205993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The influence of protocol design on the identification of ventilatory thresholds and the attainment of peak physiological responses during synchronous arm crank ergometry in able-bodied participants. Kouwijzer I; Valize M; Valent LJM; Grandjean Perrenod Comtesse P; van der Woude LHV; de Groot S Eur J Appl Physiol; 2019 Oct; 119(10):2275-2286. PubMed ID: 31435767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Adaptation to a standardized training program and changes in fitness in a large, heterogeneous population: the HERITAGE Family Study. Skinner JS; Wilmore KM; Krasnoff JB; Jaskólski A; Jaskólska A; Gagnon J; Province MA; Leon AS; Rao DC; Wilmore JH; Bouchard C Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Jan; 32(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 10647543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Response of patients with coronary artery disease stratified by ejection fraction following short-term training. Szmedra L; Bacharach DW; Buckenmeyer PJ; Hermann DT; Ehrich DA Int J Cardiol; 1994 Oct; 46(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 7814175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Metabolic and cardiovascular adjustment to arm training. Magel JR; McArdle WD; Toner M; Delio DJ J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol; 1978 Jul; 45(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 670036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A physiological comparison of forward vs reverse wheelchair ergometry. Linden AL; Holland GJ; Loy SF; Vincent WJ Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Nov; 25(11):1265-8. PubMed ID: 8289614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Physiological responses of wheelchair athletes at percentages of top speed. Campbell IG; Williams C; Lakomy HK Br J Sports Med; 1997 Mar; 31(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9132209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The comparison of peak oxygen uptake between swim-bench exercise and arm stroke. Ogita F; Taniguchi S Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1995; 71(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 8549570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of crank rate strategy on peak aerobic power and peak physiological responses during arm crank ergometry. Smith PM; Doherty M; Price MJ J Sports Sci; 2007 Apr; 25(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 17454538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm-leg ergometry. Hill M; Talbot C; Puddiford M; Price M Eur J Appl Physiol; 2018 May; 118(5):1011-1019. PubMed ID: 29511919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of an increasing versus constant crank rate on peak physiological responses during incremental arm crank ergometry. Price MJ; Bottoms L; Smith PM; Nicholettos A J Sports Sci; 2011 Feb; 29(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 21154011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of an interval training programme of the upper limbs on a wheelchair ergometer in able-bodied subjects. Tordi N; Gimenez M; Predine E; Rouillon JD Int J Sports Med; 1998 Aug; 19(6):408-14. PubMed ID: 9774208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low-intensity training increases peak arm VO2 by enhancing both convective and diffusive O2 delivery. Boushel R; Ara I; Gnaiger E; Helge JW; González-Alonso J; Munck-Andersen T; Sondergaard H; Damsgaard R; van Hall G; Saltin B; Calbet JA Acta Physiol (Oxf); 2014 May; 211(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 24528535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of the physiological demands of wheelchair basketball and wheelchair tennis. Croft L; Dybrus S; Lenton J; Goosey-Tolfrey V Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2010 Sep; 5(3):301-15. PubMed ID: 20861521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effects of arm crank strategy on physiological responses and mechanical efficiency during submaximal exercise. Goosey-Tolfrey VL; Sindall P J Sports Sci; 2007 Feb; 25(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 17365532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]