These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33428021)

  • 1. In Appreciation of the Maternal and Child Health Journal's Peer Reviewers, 2020.
    Matern Child Health J; 2021 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 33428021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In Appreciation of the Maternal and Child Health Journal's Peer Reviewers, 2021.
    Matern Child Health J; 2022 Jan; 26(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 35000073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From the History of the Croatian Dermatovenereological Society - The Croatian Medical Association and an Overview of Important Information Regarding the Journal Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica.
    Dobrić I
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2018 Dec; 26(4):344-348. PubMed ID: 30665489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review practices by medical imaging journals.
    Kwee TC; Adams HJA; Kwee RM
    Insights Imaging; 2020 Nov; 11(1):125. PubMed ID: 33245469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do journals have a publication bias?
    Pickar JH
    Maturitas; 2007 May; 57(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 17376614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ERJ peer reviewers: does this pillar of the Journal's quality need help?
    Migliori GB; Soriano JB; Brusasco V; Dinh-Xuan AT
    Eur Respir J; 2011 Aug; 38(2):251-2. PubMed ID: 22741165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Red Journal's outstanding reviewers of 2013.
    Zietman AL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Apr; 88(5):984-5. PubMed ID: 24661649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods in year 50: preserving the past and preparing for the future.
    Haux R; Aronsky D; Leong TY; McCray AT
    Methods Inf Med; 2011; 50(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21229185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey.
    Tite L; Schroter S
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2007 Jan; 61(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 17183008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Errors in science: the role of reviewers.
    Székely T; Krüger O; Krause ET
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Jul; 29(7):371-3. PubMed ID: 24875588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Journal's Appreciation.
    Fava GA
    Psychother Psychosom; 2017; 86(1):11-12. PubMed ID: 27884005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The birth and evolution of a discipline devoted to information in biomedicine and health care. As reflected in its longest running journal.
    McCray AT; Gefeller O; Aronsky D; Leong TY; Sarkar IN; Bergemann D; Lindberg DA; van Bemmel JH; Haux R
    Methods Inf Med; 2011; 50(6):491-507. PubMed ID: 22146913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Red Journal's Outstanding Reviewers of 2018.
    Zietman AL; Yom SS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jul; 104(4):703-704. PubMed ID: 31063800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers.
    Callaham ML; Schriger DL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Sep; 40(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 12192358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Journal's peer-review process.
    The Editors
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Sep; 321(12):837-9. PubMed ID: 2770821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial.
    Godlee F; Gale CR; Martyn CN
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 9676667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subspecialty Influence on Scientific Peer Review for an Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal With a High Impact Factor.
    Parikh LI; Benner RS; Riggs TW; Hazen N; Chescheir NC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 129(2):243-248. PubMed ID: 28079780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Annals of General Psychiatry.
    Fountoulakis K
    Ann Gen Psychiatry; 2005 Feb; 4(1):3. PubMed ID: 15845139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.