These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33428536)

  • 1. Simple auditory and visual interruptions of a continuous visual tracking task: modality effects and time course of interference.
    Nees MA; Sampsell NG
    Ergonomics; 2021 Jul; 64(7):879-890. PubMed ID: 33428536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A common source of attention for auditory and visual tracking.
    Fougnie D; Cockhren J; Marois R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1571-1583. PubMed ID: 29717471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory versus visual spatial stimulus-response mappings in tracking and discrete dual task performance: implications for human-machine interface design.
    Tsang SNH; Chan AHS; Pan X; Man SS
    Ergonomics; 2021 Apr; 64(4):485-501. PubMed ID: 33103599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How visual information influences dual-task driving and tracking.
    Broeker L; Haeger M; Bock O; Kretschmann B; Ewolds H; Künzell S; Raab M
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Mar; 238(3):675-687. PubMed ID: 32036415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of multiple resources in predicting time-sharing efficiency: evaluation of three workload models in a multiple-task setting.
    Sarno KJ; Wickens CD
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(1):107-30. PubMed ID: 11541493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An eye movement analysis of the effect of interruption modality on primary task resumption.
    Ratwani R; Trafton JG
    Hum Factors; 2010 Jun; 52(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 21077561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mental workload variations during different cognitive office tasks with social media interruptions.
    Zahmat Doost E; Zhang W
    Ergonomics; 2023 May; 66(5):592-608. PubMed ID: 35856248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye Tracking to Evaluate the Effects of Interruptions and Workload in a Complex Task.
    Kanaan D; Moacdieh NM
    Hum Factors; 2022 Nov; 64(7):1168-1180. PubMed ID: 33555965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech Auditory Alerts Promote Memory for Alerted Events in a Video-Simulated Self-Driving Car Ride.
    Nees MA; Helbein B; Porter A
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):416-26. PubMed ID: 26884437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-task interference while receiving information on a head mounted display and manual tracking with and without auditory warnings.
    Ward MD; Helton WS
    Appl Ergon; 2022 May; 101():103713. PubMed ID: 35168087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Isolating the neural mechanisms of interference during continuous multisensory dual-task performance.
    Kasper RW; Cecotti H; Touryan J; Eckstein MP; Giesbrecht B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 24047391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sustained Attention in Auditory and Visual Monitoring Tasks: Evaluation of the Administration of a Rest Break or Exogenous Vibrotactile Signals.
    Arrabito GR; Ho G; Aghaei B; Burns C; Hou M
    Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1403-16. PubMed ID: 26276365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supporting interruption management and multimodal interface design: three meta-analyses of task performance as a function of interrupting task modality.
    Lu SA; Wickens CD; Prinet JC; Hutchins SD; Sarter N; Sebok A
    Hum Factors; 2013 Aug; 55(4):697-724. PubMed ID: 23964412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario.
    Hopkins K; Kass SJ; Blalock LD; Brill JC
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 27267493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vigilance to Spatialized Auditory Displays: Initial Assessment of Performance and Workload.
    Greenlee ET; Hess LJ; Simpson BD; Finomore VS
    Hum Factors; 2024 Apr; 66(4):987-1003. PubMed ID: 36455164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation on the effects of presentation modality for spatial signals on human performance using a dual task paradigm.
    Kang SX; Man SS; Chan AHS
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103898. PubMed ID: 36115134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effects of Cognitive and Visual Workload on Peripheral Detection in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):855-869. PubMed ID: 29791188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Raw National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) Questionnaire to Assess Perceived Workload in Patient Monitoring Tasks: Pooled Analysis Study Using Mixed Models.
    Said S; Gozdzik M; Roche TR; Braun J; Rössler J; Kaserer A; Spahn DR; Nöthiger CB; Tscholl DW
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Sep; 22(9):e19472. PubMed ID: 32780712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task performance and eye activity: predicting behavior relating to cognitive workload.
    Tsai YF; Viirre E; Strychacz C; Chase B; Jung TP
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B176-85. PubMed ID: 17547318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory temporal preparation induced by rhythmic cues during concurrent auditory working memory tasks.
    Cutanda D; Correa Á; Sanabria D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):790-7. PubMed ID: 25893682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.