134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33428568)
1. Quantitative Evaluation of an Automated Cone-Based Breast Ultrasound Scanner for MRI-3D US Image Fusion.
Nikolaev AV; de Jong L; Weijers G; Groenhuis V; Mann RM; Siepel FJ; Maris BM; Stramigioli S; Hansen HHG; de Korte CL
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2021 Apr; 40(4):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 33428568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound-guided breast biopsy using an adapted automated cone-based ultrasound scanner: a feasibility study.
Nikolaev AV; de Jong L; Zamecnik P; Groenhuis V; Siepel FJ; Stramigioli S; Hansen HHG; de Korte CL
Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 50(6):3475-3489. PubMed ID: 36879348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective Study Comparing Two Second-Look Ultrasound Techniques: Handheld Ultrasound and an Automated Breast Volume Scanner.
Kim Y; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Lee EJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2103-12. PubMed ID: 27503758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) versus hand-held ultrasound as a second look procedure after magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C
Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3767-3775. PubMed ID: 28120030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial results of the FUSION-X-US prototype combining 3D automated breast ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Schaefgen B; Heil J; Barr RG; Radicke M; Harcos A; Gomez C; Stieber A; Hennigs A; von Au A; Spratte J; Rauch G; Rom J; Schütz F; Sohn C; Golatta M
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 29302784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in assessing breast cancer size: A comparison with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Linda A; Lorenzon M; Zuiani C
Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1000-1008. PubMed ID: 29018952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatially tracked whole-breast three-dimensional ultrasound system toward point-of-care breast cancer screening in high-risk women with dense breasts.
Park CKS; Xing S; Papernick S; Orlando N; Knull E; Toit CD; Bax JS; Gardi L; Barker K; Tessier D; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3944-3962. PubMed ID: 35319105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geometrically variable three-dimensional ultrasound for mechanically assisted image-guided therapy of focal liver cancer tumors.
Gillies DJ; Bax J; Barker K; Gardi L; Kakani N; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5135-5146. PubMed ID: 32686142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stereotactic mammography imaging combined with 3D US imaging for image guided breast biopsy.
Surry KJ; Mills GR; Bevan K; Downey DB; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4348-58. PubMed ID: 18072500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of ultrasound synthetic aperture imaging using bidirectional pixel-based focusing: preliminary phantom and in vivo breast study.
Kim C; Yoon C; Park JH; Lee Y; Kim WH; Chang JM; Choi BI; Song TK; Yoo YM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Oct; 60(10):2716-24. PubMed ID: 23686939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An automated 3D annotation method for breast ultrasound imaging.
Jiang WW; Zheng YP
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():488-91. PubMed ID: 23365935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated 3D ultrasound elastography of the breast: a phantom validation study.
Hendriks GA; Holländer B; Menssen J; Milkowski A; Hansen HH; de Korte CL
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 61(7):2665-79. PubMed ID: 26976196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Position-based modeling of lesion displacement in ultrasound-guided breast biopsy.
Tagliabue E; Dall'Alba D; Magnabosco E; Tenga C; Peterlik I; Fiorini P
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Aug; 14(8):1329-1339. PubMed ID: 31161556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) compared to handheld ultrasound (HHUS) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) in the early assessment of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an emerging role to monitoring tumor response?
D'Angelo A; Orlandi A; Bufi E; Mercogliano S; Belli P; Manfredi R
Radiol Med; 2021 Apr; 126(4):517-526. PubMed ID: 33385300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Six-year prospective evaluation of second-look US with volume navigation for MRI-detected additional breast lesions.
Fausto A; Bernini M; La Forgia D; Fanizzi A; Marcasciano M; Volterrani L; Casella D; Mazzei MA
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1799-1808. PubMed ID: 30324386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement Between an Automated Volume Breast Scanner and Handheld Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Examinations.
Barr RG; DeVita R; Destounis S; Manzoni F; De Silvestri A; Tinelli C
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 28569407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Volume Scanning (ABVS) Compared to Handheld Ultrasonography With Breast MRI as the Gold Standard.
Schmachtenberg C; Fischer T; Hamm B; Bick U
Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):954-961. PubMed ID: 28336007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial clinical results with a fusion prototype for mammography and three-dimensional ultrasound with a standard mammography system and a standard ultrasound probe.
Emons J; Wunderle M; Hartmann A; Radicke M; Rauh C; Uder M; Gass P; Fasching PA; Langemann H; Beckmann MW; Schulz-Wendtland R; Jud SM
Acta Radiol; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1406-1413. PubMed ID: 29498297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A 3D ultrasound scanning system for image guided liver interventions.
Neshat H; Cool DW; Barker K; Gardi L; Kakani N; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112903. PubMed ID: 24320470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
