These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33429813)
1. Which is the better choice? A clinical cohort study protocol evaluating the differences between standard medial parapatellar and minimally invasive approaches in total knee replacement. Jia Q; Chen X; Zhang J; Hu Y Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jan; 100(1):e24209. PubMed ID: 33429813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using mini midvastus or medial parapatellar approach technique: A prospective, randomized, international multicentre trial. Feczko P; Engelmann L; Arts JJ; Campbell D BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():19. PubMed ID: 26762175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the TOPKAT RCT. Beard DJ; Davies LJ; Cook JA; MacLennan G; Price A; Kent S; Hudson J; Carr A; Leal J; Campbell H; Fitzpatrick R; Arden N; Murray D; Campbell MK Health Technol Assess; 2020 Apr; 24(20):1-98. PubMed ID: 32369436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcome measures of TKR: Comparison of Asian to North American patients. Budhiparama NC; Gaudiani MA; White PB; Satalich J; Nelissen RG; Ranawat AS; Ranawat CS J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(2):2309499019844551. PubMed ID: 31084298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subvastus Exposure Compared to Parapatellar Approach in Navigated Sequential Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (SBTKA): A Prospective Randomized Study. Jhurani A; Agarwal P; Aswal M; Rasquinha C; Srivastava M J Knee Surg; 2021 May; 34(6):635-643. PubMed ID: 31683350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study. Li Z; Cheng W; Sun L; Yao Y; Cao Q; Ye S; Qi L; Xu S; Wu X; Jing J Int Orthop; 2018 Mar; 42(3):543-549. PubMed ID: 29199379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting outcomes up to 2 year follow up. Tasker A; Hassaballa M; Murray J; Lancaster S; Artz N; Harries W; Porteous A Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):189-93. PubMed ID: 23972565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subvastus versus Medial Parapatellar Approach in Primary Total Knee Replacement: An Assessment of Early Function. Ugbeye ME; Itakpe SE; Ayodabo OJ West Afr J Med; 2018; 35(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 29607472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in adults with isolated medial osteoarthritis: A matched study protocol. Yin Z; Qian P; Wu X; Gao F; Xu F Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Aug; 99(35):e21868. PubMed ID: 32871911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Beard DJ; Davies LJ; Cook JA; MacLennan G; Price A; Kent S; Hudson J; Carr A; Leal J; Campbell H; Fitzpatrick R; Arden N; Murray D; Campbell MK; Lancet; 2019 Aug; 394(10200):746-756. PubMed ID: 31326135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty ensures excellent functional outcome and high survivorship in the long term. Walker T; Hetto P; Bruckner T; Gotterbarm T; Merle C; Panzram B; Innmann MM; Moradi B Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 May; 27(5):1658-1664. PubMed ID: 30465099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mini-midvastus versus mini-medial parapatellar approach for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: outcomes pendulum is at equilibrium. Heekin RD; Fokin AA J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 23790343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome of revision UKR to TKR when compared to a matched group of TKR of same total arthroplasty lifespan. Jonas SC; Jermin P; Howells N; Porteous A; Murray J; Robinson J Knee; 2019 Mar; 26(2):400-404. PubMed ID: 30792107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial protocol in China. Yu Y; Sheng J; Zhou X Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Aug; 99(32):e21508. PubMed ID: 32769888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional and radiological outcome after total knee replacement performed with mini-midvastus or conventional arthrotomy: controlled randomised trial. Juosponis R; Tarasevicius S; Smailys A; Kalesinskas RJ Int Orthop; 2009 Oct; 33(5):1233-7. PubMed ID: 18654774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SMOC approach for total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees. Li T; Liu Y; Li C; Zhang H J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Feb; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 35193617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Ikejiani CE; Leighton R; Petrie DP Can J Surg; 2000 Feb; 43(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 10714255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mini-midvastus versus mini-medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Zhang Z; Zhu W; Gu B; Zhu L; Chen C Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Mar; 133(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 23229457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial. Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety of single-anaesthetic versus staged bilateral primary total knee replacement: experience from the New Zealand National Joint Registry. Wyatt MC; Hozack J; Frampton C; Hooper GJ ANZ J Surg; 2019 May; 89(5):567-572. PubMed ID: 30968551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]