These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33430271)
1. Does Printing Orientation Matter? In-Vitro Fracture Strength of Temporary Fixed Dental Prostheses after a 1-Year Simulation in the Artificial Mouth. Nold J; Wesemann C; Rieg L; Binder L; Witkowski S; Spies BC; Kohal RJ Materials (Basel); 2021 Jan; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 33430271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of printing orientation on the fracture strength of additively manufactured 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses after aging. Diken Turksayar AA; Donmez MB; Olcay EO; Demirel M; Demir E J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104155. PubMed ID: 35526752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexural Strength of 3D-Printing Resin Materials for Provisional Fixed Dental Prostheses. Park SM; Park JM; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY Materials (Basel); 2020 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 32911702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture load of 3D-printed fixed dental prostheses compared with milled and conventionally fabricated ones: the impact of resin material, build direction, post-curing, and artificial aging-an in vitro study. Reymus M; Fabritius R; Keßler A; Hickel R; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):701-710. PubMed ID: 31127429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated by 3D gel deposition show higher fracture strength than conventionally milled counterparts. Rabel K; Nold J; Pehlke D; Shen J; Abram A; Kocjan A; Witkowski S; Kohal RJ J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Nov; 135():105456. PubMed ID: 36150323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture load of three-unit full-contour fixed dental prostheses fabricated with subtractive and additive CAD/CAM technology. Zimmermann M; Ender A; Attin T; Mehl A Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 31286262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Alkharrat AR; Schmitter M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1663-1673. PubMed ID: 29196948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of interim materials for direct fixed dental prostheses and their fabrication with CAD/CAM technique. Peñate L; Basilio J; Roig M; Mercadé M J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 25935084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flexural strength and Weibull characteristics of stereolithography additive manufactured versus milled zirconia. Revilla-León M; Al-Haj Husain N; Ceballos L; Özcan M J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):685-690. PubMed ID: 32434662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CAD/CAM Resin-Based Composites for Use in Long-Term Temporary Fixed Dental Prostheses. Hensel F; Koenig A; Doerfler HM; Fuchs F; Rosentritt M; Hahnel S Polymers (Basel); 2021 Oct; 13(20):. PubMed ID: 34685228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of photopolymer resins for dental prosthetics fabricated via the stereolithography process at different polymerization temperatures. Part II: Dimensional accuracy and fracture load of fixed dental prostheses. Lee JM; Son K; Lee KB J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):330.e1-330.e9. PubMed ID: 37993321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of an experimental silica-nylon reinforcement on the fracture load and flexural strength of bisacrylic interim partial fixed dental prostheses. Almeida CS; Amaral M; de Cássia Papaiz Gonçalves F; de Arruda Paes-Junior TJ J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 26548883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]