BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33430780)

  • 1. Balanced steady-state free precession MRCP is a robust alternative to respiration-navigated 3D turbo-spin-echo MRCP.
    Hasse FC; Selmi B; Albusaidi H; Mokry T; Mayer P; Rupp C; Kauczor HU; Weber TF
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Jan; 21(1):10. PubMed ID: 33430780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical impact of 3-dimensional balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 T: prospective intraindividual comparison with 3-dimensional turbo-spin-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Itatani R; Namimoto T; Takaoka H; Katahira K; Noda S; Toyonari N; Yamashita Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25299796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid 3D navigator-triggered MR cholangiopancreatography with SPACE sequence at 3T: only one-third acquisition time of conventional 3D SPACE navigator-triggered MRCP.
    Sun B; Chen Z; Duan Q; Xue Y; Zheng E; He Y; Lin L; Li G; Zhang Z
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jan; 45(1):134-140. PubMed ID: 31781898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GRASE Revisited: breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a Gradient and Spin Echo (GRASE) technique at 3T.
    Nam JG; Lee JM; Kang HJ; Lee SM; Kim E; Peeters JM; Yoon JH
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3721-3728. PubMed ID: 29392471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How reliable is MRCP with an SS-FSE sequence at 3.0 T: comparison between SS-FSE BH and 3D-FSE BH ASSET sequences.
    Lavdas E; Vlychou M; Arikidis N; Kapsalaki E; Roka V; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis I; Vassiou K
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 23522790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preoperative evaluation of the cystic duct for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of navigator-gated prospective acquisition correction- and conventional respiratory-triggered techniques at free-breathing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography.
    Itatani R; Namimoto T; Kajihara H; Yoshimura A; Katahira K; Nasu J; Matsushita I; Sakamoto F; Kidoh M; Yamashita Y
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1911-8. PubMed ID: 23443353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography with a small field-of-view and high resolution acquisition: Clinical feasibility in biliary and pancreatic disorders.
    Zhu L; Xue H; Sun Z; Qian T; Weiland E; Kuehn B; Asbach P; Hamm B; Jin Z
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1389-1399. PubMed ID: 29656611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical Feasibility of 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Using Compressed Sensing: Comparison of Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance.
    Yoon JH; Lee SM; Kang HJ; Weiland E; Raithel E; Son Y; Kiefer B; Lee JM
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):612-619. PubMed ID: 28448309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usefulness of the Short-Echo Time Cube Sequence at 3-T Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: Prospective Comparison With the Conventional 3-Dimensional Fast Spin-Echo Sequence.
    Itatani R; Namimoto T; Kusunoki S; Mizuguchi T; Ohtsuka S; Yamashita Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 26966952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) and compressed sensing sequences for single breath-hold three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with T
    Morimoto-Ishikawa D; Hyodo T; Takenaka M; Matsukubo Y; Numoto I; Itoh M; Ohmi M; Kamata K; Ueda Y; Wakana M; Kudo M; Saito S; Ishii K
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 May; 150():110279. PubMed ID: 35364450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency of common bile duct motion artifacts caused by inferior vena cava pulsation on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Morita S; Ueno E; Saito N; Suzuki K; Machida H; Fujimura M; Maruyama K; Onodera Y; Watanabe K; Suzuki T; Ohnishi T; Imura C; Mitsuhashi N
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2008; 7(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18460846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compressed-Sensing Accelerated 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: Application in Suspected Pancreatic Diseases.
    Zhu L; Wu X; Sun Z; Jin Z; Weiland E; Raithel E; Qian T; Xue H
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Mar; 53(3):150-157. PubMed ID: 28976478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using optimized integrated combination with parallel imaging and compressed sensing technique.
    Nagata S; Goshima S; Noda Y; Kawai N; Kajita K; Kawada H; Tanahashi Y; Matsuo M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1766-1772. PubMed ID: 30659308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques.
    Sodickson A; Mortele KJ; Barish MA; Zou KH; Thibodeau S; Tempany CM
    Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):549-59. PubMed ID: 16436816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is MRCP necessary to diagnose pancreas divisum?
    Bogveradze N; Hasse F; Mayer P; Rupp C; Tjaden C; Klauss M; Kauczor HU; Weber TF
    BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Apr; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 31035952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of compressed sensing to 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions.
    Furlan A; Bayram E; Thangasamy S; Barley D; Dasyam A
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():131-136. PubMed ID: 29859947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D-MRCP for evaluation of intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts: comparison of different acquisition and reconstruction planes.
    Ringe KI; Hartung D; von Falck C; Wacker F; Raatschen HJ
    BMC Med Imaging; 2014 May; 14():16. PubMed ID: 24885665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional visualization technique compared with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for evaluation of anatomic variants of pediatric congenital choledochal cysts.
    Wang P; Gong Y; Lu S; Chen J
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2021 Jun; 37(6):705-713. PubMed ID: 33507374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
    Yoon LS; Catalano OA; Fritz S; Ferrone CR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 19478628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and two-dimensional turbo spin-echo pulse sequences.
    Kim TK; Han JK; Kim SJ; Bae SH; Choi BI
    Abdom Imaging; 1998; 23(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 9663276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.