These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33430972)

  • 1. Open-source QSAR models for pKa prediction using multiple machine learning approaches.
    Mansouri K; Cariello NF; Korotcov A; Tkachenko V; Grulke CM; Sprankle CS; Allen D; Casey WM; Kleinstreuer NC; Williams AJ
    J Cheminform; 2019 Sep; 11(1):60. PubMed ID: 33430972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
    Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
    Mansouri K; Judson RS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():361-81. PubMed ID: 27311474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informing the Human Plasma Protein Binding of Environmental Chemicals by Machine Learning in the Pharmaceutical Space: Applicability Domain and Limits of Predictability.
    Ingle BL; Veber BC; Nichols JW; Tornero-Velez R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Nov; 56(11):2243-2252. PubMed ID: 27684444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. OPERA models for predicting physicochemical properties and environmental fate endpoints.
    Mansouri K; Grulke CM; Judson RS; Williams AJ
    J Cheminform; 2018 Mar; 10(1):10. PubMed ID: 29520515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of logP and logD correction models trained with public and proprietary data sets.
    Aliagas I; Gobbi A; Lee ML; Sellers BD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Mar; 36(3):253-262. PubMed ID: 35359246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MF-SuP-p
    Wu J; Wan Y; Wu Z; Zhang S; Cao D; Hsieh CY; Hou T
    Acta Pharm Sin B; 2023 Jun; 13(6):2572-2584. PubMed ID: 37425064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting Solute Descriptors for Organic Chemicals by a Deep Neural Network (DNN) Using Basic Chemical Structures and a Surrogate Metric.
    Zhang K; Zhang H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 56(3):2054-2064. PubMed ID: 34995441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combinatorial QSAR of ambergris fragrance compounds.
    Kovatcheva A; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao YD; Zheng W; Wolschann P; Buchbauer G; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):582-95. PubMed ID: 15032539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overview of the SAMPL6 pK
    Işık M; Rustenburg AS; Rizzi A; Gunner MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Feb; 35(2):131-166. PubMed ID: 33394238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of p
    Lu Y; Anand S; Shirley W; Gedeck P; Kelley BP; Skolnik S; Rodde S; Nguyen M; Lindvall M; Jia W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Nov; 59(11):4706-4719. PubMed ID: 31647238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine learning-driven QSAR models for predicting the mixture toxicity of nanoparticles.
    Zhang F; Wang Z; Peijnenburg WJGM; Vijver MG
    Environ Int; 2023 Jul; 177():108025. PubMed ID: 37329761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Free and open-source QSAR-ready workflow for automated standardization of chemical structures in support of QSAR modeling.
    Mansouri K; Moreira-Filho JT; Lowe CN; Charest N; Martin T; Tkachenko V; Judson R; Conway M; Kleinstreuer NC; Williams AJ
    J Cheminform; 2024 Feb; 16(1):19. PubMed ID: 38378618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Multiple Linear Regressions and Neural Networks based QSAR models for the design of new antitubercular compounds.
    Ventura C; Latino DA; Martins F
    Eur J Med Chem; 2013; 70():831-45. PubMed ID: 24246731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of bioactivities of microsomal prostaglandin E
    Tian Y; Yang Z; Wang H; Yan A
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2023 Jun; 101(6):1307-1321. PubMed ID: 36752697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. jCompoundMapper: An open source Java library and command-line tool for chemical fingerprints.
    Hinselmann G; Rosenbaum L; Jahn A; Fechner N; Zell A
    J Cheminform; 2011 Jan; 3(1):3. PubMed ID: 21219648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Machine learning meets pK
    Baltruschat M; Czodrowski P
    F1000Res; 2020; 9():. PubMed ID: 32226607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 18. Reliable Prediction of Chemical-Induced Urinary Tract Toxicity by Boosting Machine Learning Approaches.
    Lei T; Sun H; Kang Y; Zhu F; Liu H; Zhou W; Wang Z; Li D; Li Y; Hou T
    Mol Pharm; 2017 Nov; 14(11):3935-3953. PubMed ID: 29037046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ADMET evaluation in drug discovery: 15. Accurate prediction of rat oral acute toxicity using relevance vector machine and consensus modeling.
    Lei T; Li Y; Song Y; Li D; Sun H; Hou T
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():6. PubMed ID: 26839598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An automated framework for QSAR model building.
    Kausar S; Falcao AO
    J Cheminform; 2018 Jan; 10(1):1. PubMed ID: 29340790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.