BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33431280)

  • 1. Pelvic Sagittal Torsion Caused by Induced Leg Length Discrepancy: Geometrical Illusion May Influence Measures Based on Superior-iliac Spines Positions.
    Souza TR; Almeida RP; Pires CV; Pinto VA; Gonçalves BT; Carvalho DS; Barsante LD; Fonseca ST
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2021 Feb; 44(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 33431280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of simulating leg length inequality on spinal and pelvic posture in the elderly].
    Zhang HF; Liao JL; Ji M; Tang SY; Jin JF; Chen L; Wu LJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 97(39):3062-3067. PubMed ID: 29081149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two alternative technical marker sets for measuring 3D pelvic motion during gait.
    Bruno P; Barden J
    J Biomech; 2015 Nov; 48(14):3876-82. PubMed ID: 26472303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do anterior/posterior translations of the thoracic cage affect the sagittal lumbar spine, pelvic tilt, and thoracic kyphosis?
    Harrison DE; Cailliet R; Harrison DD; Janik TJ
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Jun; 11(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 12107799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of simulating leg length inequality on pelvic torsion and trunk mobility.
    Young RS; Andrew PD; Cummings GS
    Gait Posture; 2000 Jun; 11(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 10802434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Induced leg length inequality affects pelvis orientation during upright standing immediately following a sit-to-stand transfer: a pre-post measurement study.
    Vella SP; Swain M; Downie A; Howarth SJ; Funabashi M; Engel RM
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Mar; 24(1):203. PubMed ID: 36932408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distance Between the Malleoli and the Ground
    Aguilar EG; Domínguez ÁG; Peña-Algaba C; Castillo-López JM
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 Mar; 107(2):112-118. PubMed ID: 28394688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Static innominate asymmetry and leg length discrepancy in asymptomatic collegiate athletes.
    Krawiec CJ; Denegar CR; Hertel J; Salvaterra GF; Buckley WE
    Man Ther; 2003 Nov; 8(4):207-13. PubMed ID: 14559043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical strategies implemented to compensate for mild leg length discrepancy during gait.
    Resende RA; Kirkwood RN; Deluzio KJ; Cabral S; Fonseca ST
    Gait Posture; 2016 May; 46():147-53. PubMed ID: 27131193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of somatic dysfunction on leg length and weight bearing.
    Qureshi Y; Kusienski A; Bemski JL; Luksch JR; Knowles LG
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Aug; 114(8):620-30. PubMed ID: 25082970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Leg length discrepancy and osteoarthritic knee pain in the elderly: an observational study.
    Noll DR
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2013 Sep; 113(9):670-8. PubMed ID: 24005087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The immediate effect of simulating leg-length discrepancy on spinal posture and pelvic position: a cross-over designed study.
    Balci A; Kocahan T; Akinoglu B; Yilmaz AE; Hasanoglu A
    Res Sports Med; 2024; 32(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 35603671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in pelvic morphology may prevent the identification of anterior pelvic tilt.
    Preece SJ; Willan P; Nester CJ; Graham-Smith P; Herrington L; Bowker P
    J Man Manip Ther; 2008; 16(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 19119397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interinnominate motion and symmetry: comparison between gymnasts and nongymnasts.
    Barakatt E; Smidt GL; Dawson JD; Wei SH; Heiss DG
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1996 May; 23(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 8728529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Functional rasterstereographic images. A new method for biomechanical analysis of skeletal geometry].
    Drerup B; Ellger B; Meyer zu Bentrup FM; Hierholzer E
    Orthopade; 2001 Apr; 30(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 11357446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative technical marker set for the pelvis is more repeatable than the standard pelvic marker set.
    Borhani M; McGregor AH; Bull AM
    Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):1032-7. PubMed ID: 23790572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship of functional leg-length discrepancy to abnormal pronation.
    Rothbart BA
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2006; 96(6):499-504; discussion 505-7. PubMed ID: 17114604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in gluteal pressure and pelvic inclination angles after continuous cross-legged sitting.
    Lee JH; Yoo WG
    Work; 2011; 40(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 21876279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normative 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric posture and spine morphology data in young healthy adult population.
    D'Amico M; Kinel E; Roncoletta P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179619. PubMed ID: 28640899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the degree of pelvic tilt within a normal asymptomatic population.
    Herrington L
    Man Ther; 2011 Dec; 16(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 21658988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.