These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33432044)

  • 21. Behavioral and electrophysiological investigations of effects of temporal regularity on illusory-figure processing.
    Kasai T; Kitajo K; Makinae S
    Brain Res; 2021 Sep; 1766():147521. PubMed ID: 34015359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ensemble summary statistics as a basis for rapid visual categorization.
    Utochkin IS
    J Vis; 2015; 15(4):8. PubMed ID: 26317396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automatic change detection during the performance of a continuous visual task.
    Tales A; Porter G; Butler S
    Neuroreport; 2009 Dec; 20(18):1638-42. PubMed ID: 19918204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Haptic categorical perception of shape.
    Gaißert N; Waterkamp S; Fleming RW; Bülthoff I
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43062. PubMed ID: 22900089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual mismatch negativity is unaffected by top-down prediction of the timing of deviant events.
    Kimura M
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1283-1292. PubMed ID: 29487967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object.
    Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. From pre-attentive processes to durable representation: an ERP index of visual distraction.
    Sysoeva OV; Lange EB; Sorokin AB; Campbell T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):310-21. PubMed ID: 25523346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anchoring visual search in scenes: Assessing the role of anchor objects on eye movements during visual search.
    Boettcher SEP; Draschkow D; Dienhart E; Võ ML
    J Vis; 2018 Dec; 18(13):11. PubMed ID: 30561493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fixation to features and neural processing of facial expressions in a gender discrimination task.
    Neath KN; Itier RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Oct; 99():97-111. PubMed ID: 26277653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Vision at a glance: The role of attention in processing object-to-object categorical relations.
    Gronau N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):671-688. PubMed ID: 31907840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Are objects the same as groups? ERP correlates of spatial attentional guidance by irrelevant feature similarity.
    Kasai T; Moriya H; Hirano S
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():49-58. PubMed ID: 21652032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of hand motion and object orientation on the automatic detection of orientation: A visual mismatch negativity study.
    Petro B; Kojouharova P; Gaál ZA; Nagy B; Csizmadia P; Czigler I
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229223. PubMed ID: 32101573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sequential sampling of visual objects during sustained attention.
    Jia J; Liu L; Fang F; Luo H
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Jun; 15(6):e2001903. PubMed ID: 28658261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Appearing and disappearing stimuli trigger a reflexive modulation of visual cortical activity.
    Hopfinger JB; Maxwell JS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15907377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automatic Change Detection in Older and Younger Women: A Visual Mismatch Negativity Study.
    Sulykos I; Gaál ZA; Czigler I
    Gerontology; 2018; 64(4):318-325. PubMed ID: 29698946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.
    Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.