BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

602 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33433574)

  • 1. Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes.
    Insogna IG; Lanes A; Lee MS; Ginsburg ES; Fox JH
    JAMA; 2021 Jan; 325(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 33433574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fresh embryo transfer after in vitro insemination of fresh vs. cryopreserved anonymous donor oocytes: which has a better live birth rate? A Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System analysis.
    Whynott RM; Summers KM; Ball GD; Van Voorhis BJ; Sparks A
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Apr; 117(4):803-810. PubMed ID: 35216830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association Between Fresh Embryo Transfers and Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfers Regarding Live Birth Rates Among Women Undergoing Long Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocols.
    Fan L; Tang N; Yao C; Wei X; Tang Y; Li J; Huang W
    Front Cell Dev Biol; 2022; 10():884677. PubMed ID: 35573703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of 7515 same donor oocyte cycle fresh and cryopreserved-thawed oocytes in 609 donor oocyte recipient cycles: A single institution analysis.
    Gursu T; Goksever Celik H; Eraslan A; Angun B; Ozaltin S; Yeh J; Bastu E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Oct; 277():110-115. PubMed ID: 36067608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes.
    Glujovsky D; Pesce R; Sueldo C; Quinteiro Retamar AM; Hart RJ; Ciapponi A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Oct; 10(10):CD006359. PubMed ID: 33112418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When using donor oocytes, does embryo stage matter? An analysis of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfers using a cryopreserved donor oocyte bank.
    Capelouto SM; Gaskins AJ; Nagy ZP; Shapiro DB; Spencer JB; Hipp HS
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Jul; 38(7):1777-1786. PubMed ID: 33821428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adherence to embryo transfer guidelines in favorable-prognosis patients aged less than 35 years using autologous oocytes and in recipients using donor oocytes: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System study.
    Gingold JA; Fazzari M; Gerber R; Kappy M; Goodman M; Lieman H; Pollack S; Singh M; Jindal S
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):548-559. PubMed ID: 35058041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.
    Ferreux L; Bourdon M; Sallem A; Santulli P; Barraud-Lange V; Le Foll N; Maignien C; Chapron C; de Ziegler D; Wolf JP; Pocate-Cheriet K
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.
    Ho JR; Woo I; Louie K; Salem W; Jabara SI; Bendikson KA; Paulson RJ; Chung K
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct; 34(10):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 28718080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.
    Glujovsky D; Farquhar C; Quinteiro Retamar AM; Alvarez Sedo CR; Blake D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; (6):CD002118. PubMed ID: 27357126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Similar ongoing pregnancy rates after blastocyst transfer in fresh donor cycles and autologous cycles using cryopreserved bipronuclear oocytes suggest similar viability of transferred blastocysts.
    Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Hudson C; Thomas S
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):319-21. PubMed ID: 19683230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of oocyte donor stimulation on recipient outcomes: data from a US national donor oocyte bank.
    Hipp HS; Gaskins AJ; Nagy ZP; Capelouto SM; Shapiro DB; Spencer JB
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):847-858. PubMed ID: 32142582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Birth outcomes are superior after transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos for donor oocyte recipients.
    Roeca C; Johnson RL; Truong T; Carlson NE; Polotsky AJ
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Dec; 35(12):2850-2859. PubMed ID: 33190157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.
    Zaat T; Zagers M; Mol F; Goddijn M; van Wely M; Mastenbroek S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Feb; 2(2):CD011184. PubMed ID: 33539543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The number of oocytes associated with maximum cumulative live birth rates per aspiration depends on female age: a population study of 221 221 treatment cycles.
    Law YJ; Zhang N; Venetis CA; Chambers GM; Harris K
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1778-1787. PubMed ID: 31398253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced oxygen concentration during human IVF culture improves embryo utilization and cumulative pregnancy rates per cycle.
    Van Montfoort APA; Arts EGJM; Wijnandts L; Sluijmer A; Pelinck MJ; Land JA; Van Echten-Arends J
    Hum Reprod Open; 2020; 2020(1):hoz036. PubMed ID: 31989044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.