These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33433840)

  • 21. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-Acceptable Symptom State in Orthopaedic Spine Surgery: A Review.
    Adindu EK; Singh D; Geck M; Stokes J; Truumees E
    JBJS Rev; 2023 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 37071742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The likelihood of reaching minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at 2 years following a 3-column osteotomy: analysis of 140 patients.
    Fakurnejad S; Scheer JK; Lafage V; Smith JS; Deviren V; Hostin R; Mundis GM; Burton DC; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Kebaish K; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 26091440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patient-reported shoulder outcomes.
    Jones IA; Togashi R; Heckmann N; Vangsness CT
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1484-1492. PubMed ID: 32249146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Defining Meaningful Functional Improvement on the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.
    Beck EC; Nwachukwu BU; Mehta N; Jan K; Okoroha KR; Rasio J; Nho SJ
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Mar; 36(3):734-742.e2. PubMed ID: 31735577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair.
    Okoroha KR; Beck EC; Nwachukwu BU; Kunze KN; Nho SJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Nov; 47(13):3141-3147. PubMed ID: 31618066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
    Kunze KN; Krivicich LM; Clapp IM; Bodendorfer BM; Nwachukwu BU; Chahla J; Nho SJ
    Arthroscopy; 2022 Jun; 38(6):2090-2105. PubMed ID: 34968653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How Can We Define Clinically Important Improvement in Pain Scores After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study.
    Beck EC; Nwachukwu BU; Kunze KN; Chahla J; Nho SJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Nov; 47(13):3133-3140. PubMed ID: 31603720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Time Required to Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement.
    Nwachukwu BU; Chang B; Adjei J; Schairer WW; Ranawat AS; Kelly BT; Nawabi DH
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Sep; 46(11):2601-2606. PubMed ID: 30067064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Treatment of Cartilage Defects of the Knee With Osteochondral Grafts.
    Wang D; Chang B; Coxe FR; Pais MD; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF; Rodeo SA; Williams RJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Jan; 47(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 30481044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do Patient Sociodemographic Factors Impact the PROMIS Scores Meeting the Patient-Acceptable Symptom State at the Initial Point of Care in Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Patients?
    Bernstein DN; Mayo K; Baumhauer JF; Dasilva C; Fear K; Houck JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Nov; 477(11):2555-2565. PubMed ID: 31261259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How Should We Define Clinically Significant Improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test for Patients Undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery?
    Okoroha KR; Lu Y; Nwachukwu BU; Beletsky A; Patel BH; Verma NN; Cole B; Forsythe B
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):241-250. PubMed ID: 31864584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores.
    Lizaur-Utrilla A; Gonzalez-Parreño S; Martinez-Mendez D; Miralles-Muñoz FA; Lopez-Prats FA
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 May; 28(5):1473-1478. PubMed ID: 31111184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Defining the "Substantial Clinical Benefit" After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement.
    Nwachukwu BU; Chang B; Fields K; Rebolledo BJ; Nawabi DH; Kelly BT; Ranawat AS
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 May; 45(6):1297-1303. PubMed ID: 28298057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool.
    Martin RL; Kivlan BR; Christoforetti JJ; Wolff AB; Nho SJ; Salvo JP; Ellis TJ; Van Thiel G; Matsuda DK; Carreira DS
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Feb; 35(2):411-416. PubMed ID: 30612776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?
    Lyman S; Lee YY; McLawhorn AS; Islam W; MacLean CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2432-2441. PubMed ID: 30179951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty: review of terminologies, methods and proposed values.
    Maredupaka S; Meshram P; Chatte M; Kim WH; Kim TK
    Knee Surg Relat Res; 2020 Apr; 32(1):19. PubMed ID: 32660584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The variability in minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state values did not have an impact on treatment effect estimates.
    Tubach F; Giraudeau B; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 62(7):725-8. PubMed ID: 19128938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the substantial clinical benefit.
    Simovitch R; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman JD; Roche CP
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 May; 27(5):903-911. PubMed ID: 29398395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference.
    Simovitch R; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman JD; Roche CP
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Feb; 27(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 29162305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.
    Asher AL; Chotai S; Devin CJ; Speroff T; Harrell FE; Nian H; Dittus RS; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Glassman SD; Bydon M; Archer KR; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 26989974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.