These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3343386)

  • 1. A comparison of the learnability of manual sign and Blissymbolics with nonhandicapped adults.
    Luftig RL; Bersani HA
    J Commun Disord; 1988 Feb; 21(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 3343386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retroactive and proactive interference effects in dual learning of blissymbolics and manual sign.
    Luftig RL; Bersani HA
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1986 Nov; 15(6):509-23. PubMed ID: 2946860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the learnability and retention between Blissymbols and CyberGlyphs.
    Alant E; Life H; Harty M
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2005; 40(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 16101272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation of the efficiency of blissymbolics vs. print in symbol learning by nonreading preschool pupils.
    Luftig RL; Bersani HA
    J Commun Disord; 1985 Aug; 18(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 2410464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning of Blissymbols and manual signs.
    Bristow D; Fristoe M
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 May; 49(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 6232428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of configuration on the paired-associate learning of blissymbols by preschool children with normal cognitive abilities.
    Fuller DR; Lloyd LL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 35(6):1376-83. PubMed ID: 1283615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative translucency of ASL signs representing three semantic classes.
    Page JL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 Aug; 50(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 4021451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. American-sign-language statements and delay of gratification in hearing-impaired and nonhandicapped children.
    Toner IJ; Ritchie FK
    J Gen Psychol; 1984 Apr; 110(2d Half):155-64. PubMed ID: 6726200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of iconicity and phonological similarity on sign learning by mentally retarded children.
    Griffith PL; Robinson JH
    Am J Ment Defic; 1980 Nov; 85(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 7446599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Isolated sign vocabulary acquisition by hearing adults: CAI vs. videotaped presentation.
    Beykirch HL; Holcomb TA; Harrington JF
    Am Ann Deaf; 1989 Mar; 134(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 2660542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of semantic and cheremic context on acquisition of manual signs.
    Mills CB; Weldon LJ
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Jan; 11(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 6855564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language.
    Shand MA; Klima ES
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1981 Nov; 7(6):464-74. PubMed ID: 7328396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Language specificity in lexical organization: evidence from deaf signers' lexical organization of American Sign Language and English.
    Hanson VL; Feldman LB
    Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 2725266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Verbal coding strategies used by hearing-impaired individuals.
    Moulton RD; Beasley DS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):559-70. PubMed ID: 1186165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Processing of formational, semantic, and iconic information in American sign language.
    Poizner H; Bellugi U; Tweney RD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Oct; 7(5):1146-59. PubMed ID: 6457112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sign language acquisition by a global aphasic.
    Moody EJ
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1982 Feb; 170(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 7057170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Translucency of sign and concreteness of gloss in the manual sign learning of moderately/severely mentally retarded students.
    Luftig RL
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 Nov; 88(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 6650579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between the motoric constraints for Amer-Ind and ASL sign formation.
    Daniloff JK; Vergara D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 6717011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of presentation modality upon learning in a comprehension task using oral, manual, and dual mode stimulus cues.
    Karlan GR; Lloyd LL; Fristoe M
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):436-43. PubMed ID: 6645469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of motoric requirements on the acquisition of manual sign responses by severely handicapped students.
    Kohl FL
    Am J Ment Defic; 1981 Jan; 85(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 6450533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.