BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3343387)

  • 1. Perception of syllable stress in esophageal speech.
    Walker CN; Morris HL
    J Commun Disord; 1988 Feb; 21(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 3343387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of tonal changes in normal laryngeal, esophageal, and artificial laryngeal male Cantonese speakers.
    Ng ML; Lerman JW; Gilbert HR
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1998; 50(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 9624857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving alaryngeal speech intelligibility.
    Christensen JM; Dwyer PE
    J Commun Disord; 1990 Dec; 23(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 2286725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of the Lombard Effect in Improving Alaryngeal Speech.
    Ng ML
    J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31350113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of lexical stress in alaryngeal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B; Garzione B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 6645467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Chu R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual speaker influence on relative intelligibility of esophageal speech and artificial larynx speech.
    Kalb MB; Carpenter MA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Feb; 46(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 7206682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Gomyo Y; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of intonational contrasts in alaryngeal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 6865370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acceptability ratings and intelligibility scores of alaryngeal speakers by three listener groups.
    Bridges A
    Br J Disord Commun; 1991 Dec; 26(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 1814417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
    Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual and acoustical analysis of alaryngeal speech: determinants of intelligibility.
    Drummond S; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):801-2. PubMed ID: 8961316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of listener sophistication on judgements of tracheoesophageal talker intelligibility.
    Doyle PC; Swift ER; Haaf RG
    J Commun Disord; 1989 Apr; 22(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 2723141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of alaryngeal voice and speech.
    Globlek D; Stajner-Katusic S; Musura M; Horga D; Liker M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2004; 29(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 15260185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Clear Speech on Cantonese Alaryngeal Speakers' Intelligibility.
    Hui TF; Cox SR; Huang T; Chen WR; Ng ML
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2022; 74(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 34333487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the speech acceptability of good and excellent esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Trudeau MD
    J Commun Disord; 1987 Feb; 20(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 3819002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Listener impressions of alaryngeal communication modalities.
    Knollhoff SM; Borrie SA; Barrett TS; Searl JP
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):540-547. PubMed ID: 33501872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing.
    Williams SE; Watson JB
    Laryngoscope; 1987 Jun; 97(6):737-9. PubMed ID: 3586817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of ratings of four artificial larynges.
    Pindzola RH; Moffet B
    J Commun Disord; 1988 Dec; 21(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 3235708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.