These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3343387)

  • 1. Perception of syllable stress in esophageal speech.
    Walker CN; Morris HL
    J Commun Disord; 1988 Feb; 21(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 3343387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of tonal changes in normal laryngeal, esophageal, and artificial laryngeal male Cantonese speakers.
    Ng ML; Lerman JW; Gilbert HR
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1998; 50(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 9624857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving alaryngeal speech intelligibility.
    Christensen JM; Dwyer PE
    J Commun Disord; 1990 Dec; 23(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 2286725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of the Lombard Effect in Improving Alaryngeal Speech.
    Ng ML
    J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31350113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of lexical stress in alaryngeal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B; Garzione B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 6645467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Chu R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual speaker influence on relative intelligibility of esophageal speech and artificial larynx speech.
    Kalb MB; Carpenter MA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Feb; 46(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 7206682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Gomyo Y; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of intonational contrasts in alaryngeal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 6865370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acceptability ratings and intelligibility scores of alaryngeal speakers by three listener groups.
    Bridges A
    Br J Disord Commun; 1991 Dec; 26(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 1814417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
    Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual and acoustical analysis of alaryngeal speech: determinants of intelligibility.
    Drummond S; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):801-2. PubMed ID: 8961316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of listener sophistication on judgements of tracheoesophageal talker intelligibility.
    Doyle PC; Swift ER; Haaf RG
    J Commun Disord; 1989 Apr; 22(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 2723141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of alaryngeal voice and speech.
    Globlek D; Stajner-Katusic S; Musura M; Horga D; Liker M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2004; 29(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 15260185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Clear Speech on Cantonese Alaryngeal Speakers' Intelligibility.
    Hui TF; Cox SR; Huang T; Chen WR; Ng ML
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2022; 74(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 34333487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the speech acceptability of good and excellent esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Trudeau MD
    J Commun Disord; 1987 Feb; 20(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 3819002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Listener impressions of alaryngeal communication modalities.
    Knollhoff SM; Borrie SA; Barrett TS; Searl JP
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):540-547. PubMed ID: 33501872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing.
    Williams SE; Watson JB
    Laryngoscope; 1987 Jun; 97(6):737-9. PubMed ID: 3586817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of ratings of four artificial larynges.
    Pindzola RH; Moffet B
    J Commun Disord; 1988 Dec; 21(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 3235708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.